SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 1268

N. SENTHILKUMAR, S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
K. M. Sathya – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: K. Thilagaraj.
For the Respondent: E. Raj Thilak.

ORDER :

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the first and second respondents herein to produce the petitioner's minor child namely S. Thamizhini, aged about 6 years, from illegal custody of the third respondent and produce before this Court forthwith and handover the custody to the petitioner and pass such further orders.

1. The habeas corpus petition has been instituted to direct the first and second respondents herein to produce the petitioner's minor child namely S. Thamizhini, aged about 6 years, from illegal custody of the third respondent.

2. Mr. E. Raj Thilak, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the minor girl is not in an illegal custody. After the death of the mother of the minor child, she is now brought up by the maternal grandparents.

3. That being the fact, the custody cannot be termed as illegal detention. If at all any dispute exist between the parties they are at liberty to approach the competent Court of law for the purpose of resolving the issues.

4. Accordingly, the habeas corpus petition stands dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top