S. M. SUBRAMANIAM, R. SAKTHIVEL
Viji – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
ORDER :
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the records in detention order passed in No. 606/BCDFGISSSV/2024 dated 30.05.2024 on the file of the 2nd respondent herein and quash the same and direct the respondents herein to produce the body of Petitioner's son Thiru.Akash M/A.23 years now confined in Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai before this Court and set him at liberty.
1. The petitioner herein, who is the mother of the detenu namely Akash S/o. Harikrishnan aged about 23 years, confined at Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai, has come forward with this petition challenging the detention order passed by the second respondent dated 30.05.2024 slapped on her son, branding him as “Goonda” under the Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the Government Order in G.O.(D).No. 82, Home, Prohibition and Excise (XVI) Department dated 15.04.2024 has not been translated in the language known to the detenue and thus the detenu is deprived from makin
The court affirmed that the right to effective representation includes the provision of documents in a language understood by the detenu, as mandated by Article 22(5) of the Constitution.
The court established that the right to effective representation includes the provision of documents in a language understood by the detenue, as mandated by Article 22(5) of the Constitution.
The court established that the right to effective representation includes the provision of documents in a language understood by the detenue, as per constitutional safeguards.
The court established that the right to effective representation in detention cases includes the provision of documents in a language understood by the detenue.
The court established that the right to effective representation in detention cases includes the provision of documents in a language understood by the detenue.
The court established that the right to effective representation includes the provision of documents in a language understood by the detenue, impacting the legality of detention.
The court established that effective representation in preventive detention cases requires documents to be provided in a language understood by the detenue.
The court established that effective representation requires documents to be provided in a language understood by the detenue, as mandated by Article 22(5).
The court established that the right to effective representation in detention cases includes the provision of documents in a language understood by the detenue.
The court established that the right to effective representation in preventive detention cases includes the provision of documents in a language understood by the detenue.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.