Back
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
Jaisuryas Retail Ventures Pvt. Ltd. , rep. By its Director Mr. Rajendra Kamath – Appellant
Versus
Registrar of Trade Marks, The office of the Trade Marks Registry, Intellectual Property Office Building G. S. T. Road, Guindy, Chennai-600 032 – Respondent
ORDER :
(Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J.) :
(Prayer in W.P.(IPD) No.4 of 2024: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to permit the Petitioner to file renewal application for renewing the trade mark registered under number 2355816 in class 35 and renew the same in accordance with due process of law.
Prayer in W.P.(IPD) No.5 of 2024: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to permit the Petitioner to file renewal application for renewing the trade mark registered under number 2388120 in class 30 and renew the same in accordance with due process of law.
Prayer in W.P.(IPD) No.6 of 2024: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to permit the Petitioner to file renewal application for renewing the trade mark registered under number 2388121 in class 29 and renew the same in accordance with due process of law.
Prayer in W.P.(IPD) No.7 of 2024: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respon
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of Section 25(3) of the Trade Marks Act, emphasizing the mandatory nature of the renewal notice and the entitlement of the pe....
The Registrar of Trade Marks must issue notices under Section 25(3) to the registered proprietor to ensure compliance before trademark removal; failure to do so enables renewal despite lapse.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of justifying undue delay in seeking renewal of a trademark and the necessity of compliance with statutory provisions.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the rejection of a renewal request should be justified, considering the communication of registration certificate and renewal notice, as pe....
The court directed the Registrar to correct the status of the expired trade mark on the website of the Registrar of Trade Marks.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of exhausting alternative remedies provided by the Trade Marks Act before seeking relief under Article 226 of the Constitution of In....
Section 20 of Trade Marks Act, 1999 provides for advertisement of an application, either after acceptance or before acceptance, so as to afford an opportunity to the public, to oppose the registratio....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a rectification petition seeking removal of a device mark from the register of trade marks must establish a fresh cause of action for rectific....
The trial court must assess only the prima facie tenability of claims regarding trademark validity under Section 124, without delving into the merits of those claims.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
