SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 5420

C. HARI SHANKAR
La Gajjar Machineries Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Kesari Lal - Aruna Industries – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Samanyu Bhatnagar and Mr. Bhav Arora, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, CGSC with Mr. Srish Kumar Mishra, Mr. Alexander Mathai Paikaday, Mr. M. Sriram and Mr. Krishnan V, Advocates, for the Respondent.

ORDER (Oral)

1. Mr. Bhatnagar, who appears on behalf of the petitioner, submits that, though the impugned mark ARUNA, against which the present petition has been preferred, has expired, it is still shown as "registered" in favour of Respondent 1 on the website of the Registrar of Trade Marks.

2. Mr. Paikaday, who appears on behalf of the Registrar of Trade Marks, submits that, at times, some delay is occasioned in showing the correct status of the trade mark.

3. As the trade mark has yet not been renewed, the Registrar is directed forthwith to correct the status of the impugned mark and show it as expired on the website of the Registrar of Trade Marks.

4. In that view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed in this petition. The petition is, accordingly, disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to revive this petition by means of an application, should the impugned trade mark be renewed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top