SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 1578

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
S. SOUNTHAR, J.
Subramania Devar - Appellant
Versus
Rathina Sabhapathy - Respondent
S.A.(MD) No. 958 of 2006
Decided On : 12-07-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. R. Devaraj.
For the Respondent: Mr. C. Dhanaseelan.

Important Points

IMPORTANT POINT
An appeal abates upon the death of the sole appellant if no legal representative is substituted.

Subject

Civil Law - Appeals

Act Referred

CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE : S.100

Headnote

ABATEMENT - SECOND APPEAL - The court dismissed the second appeal as abated due to the death of the sole appellant, Subramania Devar, as indicated by the returned registered letter. The legal provision under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code was applied, leading to the conclusion that the appeal could not proceed without the appellant.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant, Subramania Devar, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against a judgment and decree from a lower court. However, a memo was filed indicating that the registered letter sent to the appellant was returned with the endorsement 'addressee deceased.'

Finding of the Court:

The court acknowledged the memo from the appellant's counsel and noted the death of the sole appellant, leading to the conclusion that the appeal could not continue.

Issues: Whether the second appeal can proceed in the absence of the sole appellant due to their death.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that the appeal abated as the sole appellant had died, and no legal representative was present to continue the appeal.

Result: The second appeal was dismissed as abated, with no costs awarded.

JUDGMENT :

S. Sounthar, J.

[PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.134 of 2005, dated 22.02.2006, on the file of Principal Subordinate Judge, Kumbakonam, confirming the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.142 of 2003, dated 21.6.2004, on the file of Principal District Munsif, Valangaiman at Kumbakonam.]

The learned counsel for the appellant filed a memo stating that the registered letter addressed to the appellant Subramania Devar returned with an endorsment "addressee deceased returned to sendor" Therefore, the learned counsel reports "no instructions".

2. Recording the memo filed by the learned counsel for the appellant, the Second Appeal is dismissed as abated, due to the death of the sole appellant. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top