R. SAKTHIVEL
Thirunavukkarasu – Appellant
Versus
Gowri (Died) – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(R. Sakthivel, J.)
(PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, praying to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated February 21, 2019 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Ponneri in A.S.No.6 of 2012, confirming the Judgment and Decree dated February 17, 2011 passed by the learned District Munsif, Ponneri in O.S.No.340 of 2004, and consequently dismiss the Suit in O.S.No.340 of 2004.)
This Second Appeal is preferred by the unsuccessful defendants assailing the Judgment and Decree dated February 21, 2019 passed in A.S.No.06 of 2012 by the 'Subordinate Judge, Ponneri' [henceforth 'First Appellate Court'], whereby the Judgment and Decree dated February 17, 2011 passed in O.S.No.340 of 2004 by the ‘District Munsif Court, Ponneri' [henceforth 'Trial Court'] was confirmed.
2. To be noted, during pendency of the Appeal Suit before the First Appellate Court, the sole plaintiff – Elumalai died and hence, the Respondent Nos.2 to 6 in the Appeal Suit [Respondent Nos.1 to 5 herein] were brought on record as his legal representatives. For the sake of convenience, hereinafter, the parties will be referred to as per their array in the Original Sui
In a suit for injunction, the plaintiff must establish prima facie title or possession; failure to do so results in dismissal of the suit.
A suit for permanent injunction is not maintainable when a genuine dispute on title arises. The proper remedy is a comprehensive suit for declaration, reaffirming the principle that possession follow....
In a suit for permanent injunction, if the plaintiff establishes title, a reasonable presumption of lawful possession can be drawn. The defendant's challenge to the title must be examined to determin....
In a suit for injunction over vacant land, genuine title disputes necessitate a suit for declaration; mere possession does not suffice without establishing title.
A suit for injunction simpliciter is maintainable when there is interference with lawful possession, and a declaration of title is not necessary unless there is a genuine dispute over the title.
A suit for permanent injunction requires proof of possession; if title is disputed, a declaratory suit is necessary, and failure to include necessary parties renders the suit untenable.
A plaintiff seeking a permanent injunction must prove both title and settled possession, failing which the claim may be dismissed.
(1) Only when title is clear, Court can decide question of de jure possession.(2) Question of title can be decided only by filing a comprehensive suit for declaration of title and not a suit for inju....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.