IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, N. SENTHILKUMAR, JJ.
Subair – Appellant
Versus
The National Investigation Agency – Respondent
Crl. Appeal Nos. 282, 411 of 2024, Crl. M.P. No. 4266 of 2024
Decided On : 01-10-2024
JUDGMENT :
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J.
Prayer: Criminal Appeals filed under Section 21 of National Investigation Agency Act, 2008, to call for the records relating to the order dated 06.02.2024 made in Crl. M.P. No. 2476 of 2023 in Spl. S.C. No. 17 of 2022 on the file of Special Court under the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 (Sessions Court for Exclusive Trial of Bomb Blast and POTA Cases), Chennai at Poonamallee, Chennai-600056 and set aside the order of attachment and allow above appeals.
FACTUAL MATRIX:
1. The present criminal appeals have been instituted challenging the order dated 06.02.2024 passed in Crl. M.P. No. 2476 of 2023 in R.C. No. 03/2018/NIA/DLI.
2. The National Investigation Agency represented by Inspector of Police/respondent filed a petition under Section 33 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 [hereinafter referred as “UA(P) Act”] seeking attachment of the property of the 1st appellant/Accused No. 3, who is the son of 2nd appellant Mrs. Nabeesa Sulaiman.
2.1 It is not in dispute between the parties that the Spl. S.C. No. 17 of 2022 is pending on the file of the Special Court under the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008. Charges were framed by the Trial Court on 15th February, 2022 and at the time of filing the petition 36 prosecution witnesses deposed and examined.
3. On 22.09.2016 at about 23:15 hours, MR. C. Sasikumar, Spokesperson, Hindu Munnani (Front), Coimbatore was attacked indiscriminately by some unknown persons. He sustained grievous injuries on the neck, head, shoulder, hands and succumbed to his injuries in the KG Hospital at Coimbatore. Thudiyalur Police Station, Coimbatore Rural District registered FIR No. 735 of 2016, under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code (IPC) on 23.09.2016. Initially the investigation was taken over by the Special Investigation Division, CBCID, Coimbatore, considering the gravity of the offence. The Special Investigation Division (SID), Crime Branch, Crime Investigation Department (CB-CID) came to know that the A1 to A4 being members of Popular Front of India, banned organisation, conspired to strike terror on particular section of people, and to create terror among the public at large by brutally murdering MR. C. Sasikumar. The SID, CB-CID, Coimbatore arrested A1 to A4 and subsequently they were enlarged on bail. During the course of investigation, the SID, CB-CID found that the incident was not a case of simple murder, but a terrorist act committed as part of waging violent Jihad against Non-Muslims with an intention to strike terror in a section of people and general public and to create panic among them. The above facts were confirmed through the confession statements of Sadham Hussain-A2 and Subair-A3. Accordingly, the Investigating Officer invoked Sections 120-B and 153-A of IPC and Sections 16 and 18 of UA(P) Act, 1967.
4. The Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, vide their order dated 22.01.2018 entrusted the investigation to the National Investigation Agency as per powers conferred under Section 6(4) read with Section 8 of National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 (herein after referred as “NIA Act”). Accordingly, NIA took up investigation of the case by re-registering the original case on 29.01.2018. After collecting sufficient prosecutable evidence, the NIA filed chargesheet against Sadham Hussain-A2 and Subair-A3 for the commission of offence under Section 302 read with Sections 120-B, 302 read with 34, 153(A)(1)(b) of IPC and Sections 16(1)(a), 18 and 20 of UA(P) Act on 07.04.2018. Subsequently, NIA had filed supplementary chargesheet against the accused Abuthagir-A1 for the offences under Section 18 of UA(P) Act and against accused Mohammed Mubarak-A4 under Section 302 read with Sections 120B, 302 read with 34, 154(A)(1)(b) of IPC and Sections 16(1)(a), 18 and 20 UA(P) Act before the Special Court on 21.06.2018. The Special Court took cognizance of the case and numbered as C.C. No. 3 of 2018 and C.C. No. 5 of 2018 respectively and trial is unde
Kartar Singh vs. State of Punjab
People's Union For Civil Liberties and Another vs. Union of India
AI
The court affirmed that the NIA can seek property attachment under Section 33 of the UA(P) Act during trial, independent of the definition of proceeds of terrorism.
The court affirmed the seizure of funds under the UAPA, establishing that the funds were proceeds of terrorism linked to extortion activities by a terrorist organization.
The court affirmed the validity of property attachment under the U.A.P.A., confirming jurisdiction and procedural adherence despite contestation of unlawful association status.
(1) Accused shall not be entitled to be released on bail only that there are reasonable grounds for believing that accusation against such person is prima facie.(2) Once UA(P) Act is invoked, Magistr....
The court emphasized the necessity of clear evidence linking assets to proceeds of terrorism for lawful attachment under the UA(P)A.
Money Laundering – Provisional Attachment Order – Formation of opinion must bear a proximate and live nexus to purpose of protecting interest of Government revenue.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.