IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V. SIVAGNANAM, J.
M/s Axis Global Automation and Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
M/s Tonglit Autogistic Private Limited, rep. by its Legal Officer and authorised Signatory Mrs. O. Bindu Madhavi - Respondent
CRP No.281 of 2024
Decided On : 21-02-2024
ORDER :
(V. Sivagnanam, J.)
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India to issue a direction for numbering and taking on file of the petition in IA SR No.14260/2023 filed by the petitioners/defendants for setting aside the exparte order, under Order IX Rule 7 of CPC, pending on the file the Principle District Court (Commercial Court) at Chengalpattu and with further direction to dispose the same on merits, in accordance with law.)
This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to issue a direction for numbering and taking on file of the petition in IA SR No.14260/2023 filed by the petitioners/defendants for setting aside the exparte order, under Order IX Rule 7 of CPC, pending on the file the Principle District Court (Commercial Court) at Chengalpattu and with further direction to dispose the same on merits, in accordance with law.
2. The petitioners herein are the defendants and the respondent herein is the plaintiff in the commercial suit in COS No.156/2022, which was filed for recovery of money and damages. In that suit, the petitioners/defendants were set exparte on 11.08.2022 and the case was posted to 18.09.2023. Hence, the petitioners have filed a petition to set aside the exparte order, and it was returned with a query as "how this petition is maintainable to be stated in Commercial Act". Though the petitioners represented the petition with necessary details, again the petitioner was returned with the same endorsement. Aggrieved over the return of the above petition under Order IX Rule 7 of CPC, this civil revision petition has been filed.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and I have perused the materials on record.
4. Admittedly, the petitioners were set exparte on 11.08.2023 and to set aside the exparte order, they filed a petition under Order IX Rule 7 of CPC. However, it was returned on 17.12.2023, stating that how this petition is maintainable under Order IX Rule 7 of CPC in commercial Act and only appeal can lie.
5. It is argued by the learned counsel for the petitioners that, Section 13 of Commercial Courts Act, 2015, clearly prescribed the kind of orders, against which appeal would lie; and in this regard, the proviso under Section 13(1-A) of the Act clearly states that the appeal shall lie on such orders, specifically enumerated under Order 43 of CPC; but, while looking at Order 43 of CPC, it does not provide an appeal from the order of setting exparte under Order IX Rule 6(a) of CPC. It is further argued by the learned counsel for the petitioners that, there is no provision in the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, speaks about setting exparte or setting aside the exparte order and at the same time, the Act, does not preclude applicability of Order IX Rule 7 of CPC in the commercial suit.
6. At this juncture, it is worthwhile to extract Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, which runs as follows.
Provided that an appeal shall lie from such orders passed by a Commercial Division or a Commercial Court that are specifically enumerated under Order XLIII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908) as amended by this Act and section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (26 of 1996).] (2) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force or Letters Patent of a High Court, no appeal shall lie from any
The Commercial Courts Act does not preclude the applicability of Order IX Rule 7 of CPC, allowing defendants to set aside exparte orders.
A Civil Revision Petition is maintainable against a final order of the Commercial Appellate Authority under Section 115 of CPC, despite the bars on appeals and revisions in the Commercial Courts Act.
Appeals under the Commercial Courts Act relate only to specified orders, excluding non-commercial suits and those not meeting criteria for appeal.
Ex parte decree passed before Commercial Court implementation unaffected by subsequent jurisdiction changes.
An application under Order IX Rule 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure is not maintainable once the hearing is completed and the matter is posted for judgment.
Appeals under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act can only be entertained from orders of the Commercial Court, not from orders of an ordinary court.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.