SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 2240

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V. SIVAGNANAM, J.
M/s Axis Global Automation and Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
M/s Tonglit Autogistic Private Limited, rep. by its Legal Officer and authorised Signatory Mrs. O. Bindu Madhavi - Respondent
CRP No.281 of 2024
Decided On : 21-02-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. V. Subramanian.

The Commercial Courts Act does not preclude the applicability of Order IX Rule 7 of CPC, allowing defendants to set aside exparte orders.

Headnote:(A) Commercial Courts Act, 2015 - Section 13 - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Order IX Rule 7 - Setting aside exparte order - Petitioners filed a petition to set aside an exparte order but faced queries regarding maintainability under the Commercial Act - Court clarified that the Commercial Courts Act does not preclude the applicability of Order IX Rule 7 - The impugned order of return was set aside, allowing the petitioners' request to proceed. (Paras 5, 7, 8)

(B) Appeals - Scope of appeal under Commercial Courts Act - Appeal lies only for orders specifically enumerated under Order 43 of CPC; no provision exists for appeal against setting aside exparte orders under Order IX Rule 7. (Paras 5, 7)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners, defendants in a commercial suit, were set exparte and sought to set aside the order under Order IX Rule 7 of CPC. Their petition was returned with queries regarding its maintainability under the Commercial Courts Act.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the Commercial Courts Act does not prevent the application of Order IX Rule 7 and thus allowed the petitioners' request.

Issues: The main issue was whether the petition to set aside the exparte order was maintainable under the Commercial Courts Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the Commercial Courts Act does not preclude the applicability of Order IX Rule 7 of CPC in commercial suits, allowing the petitioners to proceed with their application.

Result: Civil revision petition allowed.

ORDER :

(V. Sivagnanam, J.)

(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India to issue a direction for numbering and taking on file of the petition in IA SR No.14260/2023 filed by the petitioners/defendants for setting aside the exparte order, under Order IX Rule 7 of CPC, pending on the file the Principle District Court (Commercial Court) at Chengalpattu and with further direction to dispose the same on merits, in accordance with law.)

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to issue a direction for numbering and taking on file of the petition in IA SR No.14260/2023 filed by the petitioners/defendants for setting aside the exparte order, under Order IX Rule 7 of CPC, pending on the file the Principle District Court (Commercial Court) at Chengalpattu and with further direction to dispose the same on merits, in accordance with law.

2. The petitioners herein are the defendants and the respondent herein is the plaintiff in the commercial suit in COS No.156/2022, which was filed for recovery of money and damages. In that suit, the petitioners/defendants were set exparte on 11.08.2022 and the case was posted to 18.09.2023. Hence, the petitioners have filed a petition to set aside the exparte order, and it was returned with a query as "how this petition is maintainable to be stated in Commercial Act". Though the petitioners represented the petition with necessary details, again the petitioner was returned with the same endorsement. Aggrieved over the return of the above petition under Order IX Rule 7 of CPC, this civil revision petition has been filed.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and I have perused the materials on record.

4. Admittedly, the petitioners were set exparte on 11.08.2023 and to set aside the exparte order, they filed a petition under Order IX Rule 7 of CPC. However, it was returned on 17.12.2023, stating that how this petition is maintainable under Order IX Rule 7 of CPC in commercial Act and only appeal can lie.

5. It is argued by the learned counsel for the petitioners that, Section 13 of Commercial Courts Act, 2015, clearly prescribed the kind of orders, against which appeal would lie; and in this regard, the proviso under Section 13(1-A) of the Act clearly states that the appeal shall lie on such orders, specifically enumerated under Order 43 of CPC; but, while looking at Order 43 of CPC, it does not provide an appeal from the order of setting exparte under Order IX Rule 6(a) of CPC. It is further argued by the learned counsel for the petitioners that, there is no provision in the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, speaks about setting exparte or setting aside the exparte order and at the same time, the Act, does not preclude applicability of Order IX Rule 7 of CPC in the commercial suit.

6. At this juncture, it is worthwhile to extract Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, which runs as follows.

    13. Appeals from decrees of Commercial Courts and Commercial Divisions.—(1) 1[Any person aggrieved by the judgment or order of a Commercial Court below the level of a District Judge may appeal to the Commercial Appellate Court within a period of sixty days from the date of judgment or order. (1A) Any person aggrieved by the judgment or order of a Commercial Court at the level of District Judge exercising original civil jurisdiction or, as the case may be, Commercial Division of a High Court may appeal to the Commercial Appellate Division of that High Court within a period of sixty days from the date of the judgment or order:

    Provided that an appeal shall lie from such orders passed by a Commercial Division or a Commercial Court that are specifically enumerated under Order XLIII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908) as amended by this Act and section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (26 of 1996).] (2) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force or Letters Patent of a High Court, no appeal shall lie from any

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top