SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 2203

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.T. ASHA, J.
Krishnammal - Appellant 
Versus 
The Secretary To Government Housing And Urban Development Department - Respondent 
W.P.Nos.34558, 34569 of 2023, 12221, 12223 & 12219 of 2024 and W.M.P.Nos.34477, 34484 of 2023, 13313, 13318, 13320, 13321, 13322 & 13323 of 2024
Decided on : 29-04-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : M/s.Shankar Narayanan, Senior Counsel for M/s.Aarthi Rao
For the Respondents:M/s.P.S.Raman, Advocate General Assisted by M/s.A Selvendran, Special Government Pleader for M/s/Row & Reddy, M/s.M.K.Kabir, Senior Counsel for M/s.C.Kalaichelvan

Acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession is not taken and compensation is not paid.

Headnote:(A) Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 - Section 24(2) - Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Acquisition proceedings lapsed - Petitioners sought to declare acquisition proceedings lapsed under Section 24(2) due to non-payment of compensation and non-taking of possession - Court found that possession was not taken in accordance with law and compensation was not tendered to landowners - The original acquisition proceedings were deemed lapsed as per the provisions of Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act. (Paras 46-56)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners, original landowners and subsequent purchasers, challenged the acquisition proceedings initiated in 1981, claiming that possession was never taken and compensation was never paid, leading to the lapse of the proceedings under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.

Findings of Court:
The court concluded that the acquisition proceedings had lapsed due to the failure to take possession and pay compensation, thus allowing the writ petitions.

Issues: The main issues were whether possession was taken by the authorities and whether compensation was paid to the landowners.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the acquisition proceedings lapsed as the authorities failed to prove that possession was taken and compensation was paid, emphasizing the importance of these twin conditions under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.

Result: Writ petitions allowed.

ORDER :

W.P.No.34558 of 2023 has been filed to declare that the acquisition proceedings of the respondents in respect of Award No. 4/88-89 dated 24.12.1988 for Survey No. 81/2C, admeasuring 0.37 acres and Survey No. 81/2G, admeasuring 0.65 acres, totally 1.02 acres as lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (Act 30 of 2013).

2. W.P.No.34569 of 2023 has been filed to declare that the acquisition proceedings of the respondents in respect of Award No.4/88-89 dated 24.12.1988 for Survey No. 81/2A, admeasuring 2.42 as lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (Act 30 of 2013).

3. W.P.No.12219 of 2024 has been filed to call for the records of the 4th respondent comprised in Patta proceedings No. 2023/0153/08/020919TR dated 10.11.2023 passed by the 4th respondent in respect of Survey No. 81/2C admeasuring 26 ares (0.65 acres) dated 10.11.2023 and quash the same and consequently issue a mandamus for bearing the respondents, their officers, employees, subordinates or any person claiming or acting under them from in any manner interfering with the petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment of his land admeasuring 98 Ares (2.42 acres) comprised in S.F.No. 81/2A situated in Ayyamperumalpatti Village, District Salem.

4. W.P.No.12221 of 2024 has been filed to call for the records of the 4th respondent comprised in Patta proceedings No. 2023/0153/08/020919TR dated 10.11.2023 passed by the 4th respondent in respect of Survey No. 81/2A admeasuring 98 ares (2.42 acres) dated 10.11.2023 and quash the same and consequently issue a mandamus forbearing the respondents, their officers, employees, subordinates or any person claiming or acting under them from in any manner interfering with the petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment of his land admeasuring 98 Ares (2.42 acres) comprised in S.F.No. 81/2A situated in Ayyamperumalpatti Village, District Salem.

5. W.P.No.12223 of 2024 has been filed to call for the records of the 4th respondent comprised in Patta proceedings No. 2023/0153/08/020919TR dated 10.11.2023 passed by the 4th respondent in respect of Survey No. 81/2A admeasuring 15 ares (0.37 acres) dated 10.11.2023 and quash the same and consequently issue a mandamus forbearing the respondents, their officers, employees, subordinates or any person claiming or acting under them from in any manner interfering with the petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment of his land admeasuring 98 Ares (2.42 acres) comprised in S.F.No. 81/2A situated in Ayyamperumalpatti Village, District Salem.

6. Since there is a commonality with reference to the facts, a common judgement is being passed in all these writ petitions. The issue that is involved in the present writ petitions which have been filed by the original owners and the subsequent purchaser is whether the Land Acquisition Proceedings in Survey No.81/2A measuring 2.48 acres, Survey No.81/2C measuring 0.37 acres and Survey No.81/2G, measuring 0.65 acres at Ayyamperumalpatti Village Salem, stood lapsed by virtue of the provisions of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act 2013 (herein after referred to as the “2013 Act”). The land in Survey Nos.81/2C and 81/2G belong to one K.M.Arumugam and the land in Survey N.81/2A belongs to Palaniappa Poosari.

7. The facts are as follows:-

The following lands besides other lands were subject to acquisition proceedings:-

S.No.Survey Nos.ExtentOwner
i.S.No.81/2A2.48 acresPalaniappa Poosari.
ii.S.No.81/2C0.37 acresK.M.Arumugam
iii.S.No.81/2G0.65 acresK.M.Arumugam

(i) Petitioner's Case:-

8. On 23.06.1981, a Section 4(1) Notification under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (herein after referred to as the “1894 Act”) was issued in respect of the above-referred properties. This was followed by a Declar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top