SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 2358

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. ANAND VENKATESH, J.
Prameelamma Vadiaputi - Appellant
Versus
The Inspector General of Registration Officer, Chennai - Respondent
W.P. No. 10658 of 2025
Decided On : 15-04-2025


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : V.P. Sengottuvel, K.R. Nishanth
For the Respondents: U. Baranidharan, M. Arunachalam, A.R.L. Sundaresan, K. Srinivasa Murthy

Disclosure of identity information under the Aadhaar Act requires due process and a hearing, especially in cases involving fraud and impersonation, safeguarding individual privacy rights.

Headnote:(A) Aadhaar Act, 2016 - Section 33 - Writ petition addressing impersonation and fraudulent registration of property documents - The petitioner contended that her deceased husband's identity was misused to register a fraudulent Power of Attorney and sale deed. A complaint was filed resulting in the arrest of accused persons. Court ordered cancellation of fraudulent documents and directed police investigation while ensuring compliance with legal provisions regarding identity information disclosure. (Paras 3, 6, 7)

(B) Rights concerning identity information - The court emphasized that under Section 33 of the Aadhaar Act, disclosure of identity information must follow due process, providing the concerned parties an opportunity to be heard, as reaffirmed by precedent on privacy rights (Justice K.S. Puttaswamy case). (Paras 9-14)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner claimed ownership of property through her late husband's sale deed, contending fraudulent transactions had occurred posthumously involving fabricated documents.

Issues: Main issues addressed were the legitimacy of the documents registered post-death and the need for protocol in disclosing Aadhaar information.

Findings of Court:
The court declared the fraudulent documents as illegal and ordered their cancellation while mandating police investigation into the impersonation.

Ratio Decidendi: The court underscored the necessity of a hearing process prior to disclosing identity information, thereby upholding privacy rights protected under the Aadhaar Act.

Result: Writ petition allowed with directions.

Table of Content
1. court’s order and directive regarding fraudulent documents (Para 1 , 8)
2. property ownership and fraudulent documentation (Para 3)
3. fraudulent registration of property documents. (Para 4)
4. fraudulent actions impact property rights (Para 5)
5. cooperation with police investigation (Para 6)
6. court's findings on document legality. (Para 7)

ORDER :

1. When this writ petition came up for hearing on 25.03.2025, this Court passed the following order:

1. The Unique Identification Authority of India [UIDAI], Represented by its Chairman, Khanija Bhawan, No.49, III Floor, South Wing, Race Course Road, Bengaluru - 560 001, is suo motu added as seventh respondent in this writ petition.

2. Mr. U. Baranidharan, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice on behalf of respondents 1 to 4. Mr. K. Srinivasamurthy, learned counsel takes notice on behalf of the impleaded seventh respondent. Notice to respondents 5 and 6 returnable by 15.04.2025. Private notice is also permitted.

3. The specific case of the petitioner is that the subject property belonged to her husband by virtue of a registered sale deed dated 07.02.1981. Her husband died leaving behind the petitioner, three sons and a daughter on 23.01.2017. The grievance of the petitioner is that her husband who was not even alive, was impersonated and a fake/fraudulent Power of Attorney dated 09.07.2021 came to be registered. Based on the same, a sale deed came to be registered dated 16.09.2021 in favour of the fifth respondent. The fifth respondent on the very same day, mortgaged the property with Canara Bank by depositing the title deeds and this document was registered as Document No.11341/2021. This loan was later discharged under receipt dated 17.06.2022. On coming to know of the same, a complaint was given to the police and an FIR came to be registered in Crime No.7/2023, which is pending investigation by CCB, Team-1. Totally six accused persons were arrested in this case and some of them were detained under Act 14 of 1982. The Aadhaar card that stood in the name of petitioner's husband carries Aadhaar number 8146 1471 0439 and whereas the fake Aadhaar Card found at page No.42 of the typed set of papers carries the number 6027 0928 0216.

4. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the impleaded seventh respondent shall take written instructions with respect to the genuineness of the alleged fake Aadhaar card No.6027 0928 0216 that was produced before the third / fourth respondent.

5. Post this writ petition along with W.P.No.1062 of 2025, W.P.No.8801 of 2025 and W.P.No.10273 of 2025 under the caption 'for orders' on 15.04.2025. In the meantime, there shall be a direction to the respondents 3 and 4 not to entertain registration of any document pertaining to the subject property, pending disposal of the writ petition.

2. Pursuant to the above order, notice was sent to the 6th respondent Bank and the 6th respondent Bank is also represented through a counsel.

3. The impleaded 7th respondent has filed an affidavit and the relevant portions are extracted hereunder:

9. It is submitted that the only provision which enables the Authority to disclose the identity information or authentication records of the resident is Section 33 of the Aadhaar Act {read with Regulation 3 of the Aadhaar (Sharing of Information) Regulations, 2016}, which states that the identity information or authentication records of an Aadhaar Number Holder (defined below) can be disclosed by the Authority only after an order to that effect which is passed by the Judge of a High Court. The said Section 33 (1) also provides that such Order of disclosure can only be passed after an opportunity of hearing is provided to the Authority and the concerned Aadhaar Number Holder.

Section 33 - Disclosure of information in certain cases:-

(1) Nothing contained in sub-section (2) or sub- section (5) of section 28 or sub-section (2) of section 29 shall apply in respect of any disclosure of information, including identity inform

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top