SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 2475

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS 
S.M.Subramaniam, K.Rajasekar, JJ.
Easwaramoorthy C.P. – Appellant
Versus
C.Paranthaman and ors. - Respondents
W.A.No.3642 of 2024 and C.M.P.Nos.28629 of 2024 & 7542 of 2025
Decided On : 07-04-2025


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.G.Mohammed Aseef
For the Respondent: Mr.DR.A.Thiyagarajan Senior Counsel For Mr.C.B.Murali Krishnan, Mr.Vadivelu Deenadayalan, Additional Government Pleader

The Senior Citizens Act allows seniors to void property transfers if the transferee fails to provide essential care as an implied condition, safeguarding their right to a dignified life.

Headnote:(A) Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 - Section 23(1) - The appellant, a son, allegedly subjected his senior citizen father to harassment and obtained property through a settlement deed executed under coercion, leading to a complaint by the father to deem the settlement void - The Writ Court ruled that the father’s right to a dignified life under Article 21 includes basic necessities and care, hence upholding the voiding of the settlement deed due to non-maintenance. (Paras 8, 23, 36-62)

(B) Children’s duty to maintain parents - A declaration of a settlement as void can be based on implied conditions of care and support, reflecting the provisions of social welfare legislation. (Paras 8, 26, 29)

Table of Content
1. complaint of senior citizen regarding property (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. appellant's reply and appeal process (Para 5 , 7)
3. writ court's findings on normal life provision (Para 8 , 9)
4. arguments on behalf of the appellant (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
5. legal principles governing senior citizens act (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)
6. maintaining dignity and welfare of senior citizens (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30)
7. entitlements under senior citizens act (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35)
8. interpretation of section 23 (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39)
9. legal conditions for property transfer under section 23 (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46)
10. purposive interpretation of the legislation (Para 47 , 48 , 49 , 50)
11. summary procedures for senior citizen claims (Para 51 , 52 , 53 , 54)
12. practical implications for maintaining seniors' dignity (Para 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63)
13. conclusion regarding the senior citizen's complaint (Para 68 , 69)
14. conclusion and orders (Para 70 , 71 , 72)

JUDGMENT :

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

I. Facts in Brief :

Under assail is the order dated 12.08.2024 passed in W.P.No.2367 of 2024. The 1st respondent in the present writ appeal is a senior citizen and the appellant is his son.

(A) Complaint of Senior Citizen:

2. The senior citizen filed a complaint before the Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO), Tambaram West, Chennai, stating that he has three children: two daughters and one son (appellant). Both the daughters are married and living separately. The son of senior citizen fell in love with and married a Muslim girl named Ghayas Fatima. The senior citizen, a retired Senior Accountant from the Office of the Principal Accountant General, and his wife, Mrs. Kannammal, a retired Government School Teacher, worked hard to educate and settle their children using their hard-earned savings.

(B) Allegations of Fraud and Coercion:

3. The son of the senior citizen (appellant) has allegedly subjected his parents to various atrocities after his marriage, purportedly at the instigation of his wife. The senior citizen and his wife were subjected to harassment with the ultimate goal of dispossessing the senior citizen of his self-acquired property. In the year 2014, the appellant purportedly stole the original sale deed relating to self-acquired property without the senior citizen's or his wife's knowledge, thereby usurping the property. Further, in the year 2015, the appellant and his wife allegedly coerced and deceived the senior citizen into executing a settlement deed. Through this fraudulent means, they took possession of the self-acquired property and illegally transferred ownership into the appellant's name.

4. After execution of settlement deed, the appellant neglected the 1st respondent / senior citizen and his wife and drove them out of their own house, where they had a share. Since the settlement deed was executed through fraud and coercion, the 1st respondent in his complaint made a request to declare the settlement as null and void under the provisions of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and SENIOR CITIZENS ACT , 2007, [hereinafter referred to as ' SENIOR CITIZENS ACT '].

(C) Reply by the Appellant:

5. In his reply to the complaint, the appellant stated that the appellant is still maintaining his father and mother. That apart, already the senior citizen filed a suit in O.S.No.288 of 2018 on the file of Principal District and Sessions Court, Chengalpet and subsequently it was withdrawn by the senior citizen. The appellant claimed that the settlement deed was executed with the senior citizen's consent. The appellant has further stated that he is ready and willing to maintain the senior citizen and his wife.

6. The Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO), Tambaram West, Chennai accepted the contention of the appellant and passed an order stating that the senior citizen is entitled to a 50% share in the property. The order further directed that the remaining 50% share in the property be reconv

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top