IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
J. SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.
P. Mahendran and Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Environment and Forest Department and Ors. – Respondents
W.P.No.4090 of 2020 and W.M.P.No.4849 of 2020
Decided On : 27-03-2025
(A) Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus - Impugned orders dated 26.11.2019 - Petitioners engaged as Anti-Poaching Watchers since 2012 and 2016 - Claim for inclusion in State-wide seniority list and regularization of service denied - Court found the reasons for denial to be false and baseless, highlighting discrimination against petitioners with longer service compared to juniors included in the list. (Paras 1-37)
(B) Competent Authority - The 4th respondent was not the competent authority to issue the impugned orders, which should have been issued by the 2nd respondent. (Paras 11-12)
(C) Discrimination - The court noted that individuals with lesser service were included in the seniority list while petitioners with longer service were excluded without valid reasons. (Paras 16-20)
(D) Directions - The court quashed the impugned orders for petitioners 1 to 4 and 6 to 9, directing their inclusion in the seniority list and regularization of service, while confirming the orders for petitioners 5, 10, and 11. (Paras 37-38)
ORDER :
(J. SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.)
This writ petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the Impugned Orders in (1) Na. Ka.No.2565/2019-1/Th.1 dated 26.11.2019 (2) Na.Ka.No.2565/2019-2/Th.1 dated 26.11.2019 (3) Na.Ka.No.2565/2019-3/Th.1 dated 26.11.2019 (4) Na.Ka.No.2565/2019-4/Th.1 dated 26.11.2019 (5) Na.Ka.No.2565/2019-5/ Th.1 dated 26.11.2019 (6) Na.Ka.No.2565/2019-6/Th.1 dated 26.11.2019 (7) Na.Ka.No.2565/2019-7/Th.1 dated 26.11.2019 (8) Na.Ka.No.2565/2019- 8/Th.1 dated 26.11.2019 (9) Na.Ka.No.2565/2019-9/Th.1 dated 26.11.2019 (10) Na.Ka.No.2565/2019-10/Th.1 dated 26.11.2019 (11) Na.Ka.No.2565/2019-11/Th.1 dated 26.11.2019 passed by the 4th respondent, quash the same and issue consequential directions to the 2nd respondent herein to include the names of the petitioners in the appropriate place commensurate with their dates of entry into service in the State-wide seniority List of Anti-Poaching Watchers as on 01.01.2019 prepared and issued by the 2nd respondent and grant the benefit of regularisation of their service, placement in the regular time scale of pay, and other service benefits.
2. The case of the petitioners is that they have been engaged in the Forest Department from 01.01.2012 and August 2016, respectively, till date as an Anti-Poaching Watchers in Hogenakkal, Pennagaram, and Palacode Forest Ranges to protect the forest wealth in the notified Reserve Forests belonging to the Government and to prevent the hunting of wild animals in the Reserve Forests area by outsiders and to assist the Foresters, Forest Guard, and Forest Workers in various Forest Ranges in Dharmapuri Division and also to assist them in different Centrally Sponsored Wildlife Schemes and State Schemes. In the entire State, there are more than 1000 Anti- Poaching workers. The petitioners are being paid consolidated monthly pay of Rs.4,750/- only as against Rs.6,750/- p.m. from the financial year 2013- 2014 as archived in G.O.Ms.No.146, Environment and Forest (FR2) Department, dated 26.09.2013.
3. The grievance of the petitioners is that though they have put in such longer years of service, i.e., from 3 to 9 years, respectively, they are still being paid only consolidated monthly pay till date without any security of tenure of service.
4. It is relevant to mention here that, formerly, there were posts of Plot Watchers and Social Forestry Workers in the Forest Department who were employed in connection with several Social Forestry Projects and to maintain the plantations and who were working on a daily wage basis. In order to regularise their services, the Government issued G.O.Ms.No.64, Environment and Forest (FR.2) Department, dated 08.03.1999, for the preparation of a State wide seniority list of Plot Watchers and Social Forestry Workers by the Head of the Department and on the basis of seniority in such a list, appointments may be given to the posts of Forest Watchers and malis to such of those Plot Watchers and Social Forestry Workers who know to read and write in tamil, by granting relaxation of rules relating to method of appointment, age, etc. wherever necessary, in the existing vacancies or vacancies that would arise in future.
5. At this juncture, the Government issued G.O.Ms.No.22 P&AR Department, dated 28.02.2006, that the services of employees serving on a daily wage basis in various Departments who have rendered 10 years of service may be regularised by granting necessary relaxation. The Service Association of Plot workers and Social Forestry Workers filed W.P.No.20638 of 2018 on the file of this Court, to regularise the services of Plot Watchers and Social Forestry Workers on the basis of this G.O. and this Court, by order dated 25.08.2008, passed directions to the Government to pass orders on the proposals of Principal Chief Conservator of Forests dated 30.01.2008 in this regard and pass orders in the light of G.O.Ms.No.22, P&AR Department dated 28.02.2006. The Head



The court ruled that the reasons for denying inclusion in the seniority list were false and discriminatory, emphasizing the need for fair treatment of employees based on service duration.
The Court upheld the principle that long-serving employees are entitled to regularization of service and benefits as stipulated in previous orders.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.