Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J
M. Loganathan – Appellant
Versus
Inspector of Police, Neyveli Town Police Station, Vadakuthu, Cuddalore District – Respondent
ORDER :
(G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.)
This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the proceedings of the respondent made in proceedings No.05/Neyveli Town/2025 dated 06.03.2025 thereby rejecting permission to conduct the Aadal Padal programme to be held on 21.03.2025 between 6.00 pm and 11.00 pm on the eve of “Kannuthoppu, Santhaivelipettai Village Arulmigu Mariyamman Temple at Kurinjipadi Taluk, Cuddalore District along with the consequential prayer for granting permission and an adequate police protection to conduct the Aadal Padal programme on 21.03.2025.
2. The petitioner has averred that he belongs to Kannuthoppu, Santhaivelipettai Village and that in their village, there exists a temple known as Arulmigu Mariyamman Temple, which is an ancient and culturally significant temple with a rich heritage. For the past 12 years, the residents of the village have been celebrating the Kodai Festival. During the temple festival, a cultural event known as the "Aadal Padal" programme has been conducted for the past two decades in a peaceful manner, without any law and order issues. In the current year, the Arulmigu Mariyamman Temple Festival is scheduled to be held over two da
Cultural events should not be denied without substantial justification, and authorities must respond promptly to requests for permissions.
Traditional cultural celebrations should not be denied without substantial evidence of potential disruption, and timely police responses to permission requests are essential.
Cultural events with a history of peaceful conduct should not be denied by police without substantial justification, and timely consideration of requests is essential.
The court affirmed the right to conduct traditional cultural events, emphasizing the need for police to grant permissions unless significant law and order concerns exist.
The court upheld the right to conduct customary cultural programmes, emphasizing timely police action and the need for substantial evidence to deny permission based on law and order concerns.
The court upheld the right to conduct traditional cultural programs, emphasizing timely police consideration and the importance of maintaining public order.
The court affirmed the right to conduct traditional cultural programmes, emphasizing timely police consideration and the necessity of maintaining public order.
Traditional cultural programs should not be denied without substantial evidence of potential law and order issues, emphasizing the importance of cultural heritage.
Traditional cultural celebrations must be respected, and police must consider requests for such events reasonably and within a specified timeframe.
Traditional cultural events should be permitted unless substantial law and order concerns are evidenced, emphasizing timely police consideration of requests for protection.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
