SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 3238

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT 
G. JAYACHANDRAN, R. POORNIMA, JJ.
G. Aravinth & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
Kalyanasundaram & Ors. - Respondents
C.M.A.(MD) No.89 of 2019
Decided On : 28-02-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. N. Tamilmani for M/s.N.Ilango.
For the Respondents: Mr. S. Srinivasa Raghavan, Mr. V. Sakthivel.

The court revised the compensation for loss of dependency and recognized loss of love and affection, establishing that contributory negligence should not diminish rightful compensation.

Headnote:(A) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Compensation for loss of dependency - The Tribunal's decision was appealed regarding the awarded compensation, questioning the notional income and loss of love and affection due to the death of a medical student. Contributory negligence was fixed at 50% due to the victim's rash driving. (Paras 3, 4)

(B) Compensation Calculation - The notional income for the deceased was revised to Rs.12,000/- per month, with a future prospect uplift of 40%, leading to an annual income of Rs.1,00,800/- and total loss of dependency calculated at Rs.18,14,400/- based on a multiplier of 18. (Paras 4)

(C) Final Compensation - The court awarded Rs.18,80,100/- in total compensation with additional amounts for loss of love and affection at Rs.80,000/- for two claimants, and confirmed awards under other heads. (Paras 4)

(D) Costs - Insurance company directed to deposit the awarded amount with interest at 7.5% p.a. (Paras 5)

Facts of the case:
The appeal was by the claimants against a Tribunal ruling, claiming inadequate compensation for loss of their son. Issues addressed include the victim's contributory negligence and proper calculation of notional income.

Findings of Court:
The Tribunal's reduction of notional income for the victim was modified and additional compensation was allowed for loss of love and affection.

Issues: Whether the notional income was properly assessed and the appropriateness of contributory negligence.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the victim’s potential income was underrepresented, leading to a necessary adjustment in compensation, affirming that love and affection losses must be considered.

Result: Appeal partly allowed, compensation enhanced.

Table of Content
1. overview of the case and appeal (Para 1)
2. court reviewed evidence of negligence and income assessment. (Para 2)
3. arguments regarding compensation calculation and losses (Para 3)
4. court's analysis on negligence and income calculation (Para 4)
5. final compensation award decision (Para 5)

JUDGMENT :

G. JAYACHANDRAN, R. POORNIMA, JJ.

The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is directed against the judgment and decree made in M.C.O.P.No.1211 of 2026, dated 12.09.2018, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/Special Sub-Court, Thanjavur.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials placed before this Court.

3. The above appeal is filed by the claimants questioning the compensation awarded without taking into account the loss of love and affection of the claimants, who lost their only son and also on fixation of notional income of Rs. 10,000/- for a medical college student, aged 23 years, who had a bright prospect. Further, reduction of 50% towards contributory negligence was also questioned.

4. The learned counsel for the second respondent/Insurance Company would submit that evidence of the witness clearly show that the motor accident victim had driven his two wheeler rash and negligently, overtook the passer bike and dashed against the car without proper diligence. Though there are two conflicting testimony on either side regarding negligence, this Court finds that the reasoning of the Tribunal holding that there was contributory negligence on either side equally and fix 50% contributory negligence on the part of the victim. As far as notional income is concerned, taken into account the fact that the victim was pursuing MBBS and therefore the notional income has to be fixed at Rs. 12,000/-p.m with proportionate future prospectus. By taking the notional income of the deceased at Rs.12,000/- and by adding future prospects at 40% for a deceased bachelor, the monthly income comes to Rs.16,800/-(Rs.12,000/-+Rs.4,800/-). By deducting personal expenses of the deceased at 50%, the monthly income comes to Rs.8400/- and the annual income comes to Rs.1,00,800/- and by adopting multiplier of ‘18’ for the age group of the deceased, the total loss of dependency is arrived at Rs.18,14,400/-(Rs.1,00,800 x18).The award of the Tribunal is modified to that effect with compensation for loss of love and affection at Rs.40,000/- each for the two claimants. The award under other heads stand confirmed.The modified award amount is as follows:

S.No.Name of the headsAwarded by the TribunalAwarded by this CourtRemarks
1For loss of dependencyRs.15,12,000/-Rs.18,14,400/-enhanced
2For medical expensesRs.45,699/-Rs.45,699/-same
3For loss of love and affectionNilRs.80,000- (Rs.40,000/- each for two claimantsNot awarded
For loss of consortiumNilNilSame
5For loss of estateRs.15,000/- eachRs.15,000/-same
6For funeral expensesRs.15,000/-Rs.15,000/-Same
7TotalRs.15,88,699/- 50% - Rs.7,94,350/-Rs.18,80,099/- rounded off to Rs.18,80,100/- 50% Rs.9,40,050/-enhanced

The second appellant/mother is entitled to a sum of Rs.9.40,050/- as compensation with interest at the rate of 7.5% p.a from the date of claim petition till the date of deposit. The claim petition in respect of first appellant is already dismissed by the trial Court and the same stand confirmed

5. In the result, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is partly allowed by enhancing the compensation from Rs.7,94,350/- to Rs.9,40,050/- with interest at the rate of 7.5% pa from the date of claim petition till the date of deposit. The second respondent Insurance Company is directed to deposit the award amount, less the award amount, if any already deposited, to the credit of claim petition before the Tribunal within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On such deposit being made, the second appellant/mother is permitted to withdraw the award amount with accrued interest and costs, less the award amount if any already withdrawn, by filing necessa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top