Back
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
P.B.Balaji, J
M.Mohamed Mustafa – Appellant
Versus
District Collector, Sivagangai – Respondent
ORDER :
P.B.Balaji, J.
The petitioners have filed the instant writ petition seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the third respondent to disburse compensation amount along with interest, in respect of the land acquisition proceedings, which has been initiated against the petitioners in respect of S.No.182/2.
2.According to the petitioners, the lands were acquired and the award also came to be passed on 02.12.2014. It is the further case of the petitioners that despite production of title deeds as well as patta standing in the name of the petitioners, the authorities have not paid compensation for the lands acquired from the petitioners in S.No.182/2 and erroneously withheld the amount on the ground that the petitioners have not satisfied the authority about their title.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that physical possession has also not been taken from the petitioners. It is also the admitted case of the petitioners that in respect of other survey numbers and neighboring land owners, compensation has been disbursed and only in respect of S.No.182/2 the compensation has been withheld, on the ground of reclassification of the lands as 'Government thar
Landowners are entitled to fair compensation regardless of reclassification, provided their ownership is established, emphasizing public benefit in land acquisition.
Subsequent purchasers of land can only claim compensation based on their vendors' titles and cannot challenge acquisition proceedings initiated under different statutes.
Section 24 of the Right to Compensation Act does not apply to acquisitions initiated under the West Bengal Requisition and Acquisition Act; subsequent purchasers can only claim compensation based on ....
Once the land is acquired and vests in the State, it cannot be divested, and subsequent purchasers have no authority to challenge the acquisition proceeding.
Assignees of Government lands are entitled to compensation equal to that of patta lands when acquired, as statutory rights under the Land Acquisition Act override any ex-gratia payments.
The court affirmed the obligation of the state to pay compensation for land acquisition as mandated by law, emphasizing the validity of the award and the constitutional right to property.
Co-owners of jointly acquired land entitled to same judicially determined enhanced compensation as awarded to one co-owner via reference and appeal, even without own application under Section 18 or 2....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the assessment of compensation based on the market value of the land at the time of notification under Section 4(1) and the determination of land v....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
