SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 3636

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Abdul Quddhose, J.
M/s. TVS Credit Services Ltd. and ors. - Petitioner
Versus
M/s.The Peripheral Store and ors. – Respondents
Arb O.P.(COM.DIV.) No.323 of 2024
Decided On : 19-02-2025


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. M. Arunachalam
For the Respondent: Mr. Thivakkaran

The existence of arbitration clauses in interlinked contracts suffices for appointing an Arbitrator, and procedural missteps do not bar relief if entitlement is established.

Headnote:(A) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11 and 15 - Petition for appointment of an Arbitrator - Dispute arose from three interlinked contracts with arbitration clauses - Respondents objected to the appointment citing non-compliance with Section 21 - Court found prima facie existence of arbitration clauses and rejected objections - Petition allowed, Arbitrator appointed. (Paras 1-11)

(B) Arbitration Clauses - Existence of arbitration clauses in all contracts is undisputed - Court emphasized that quoting wrong provisions does not bar relief if entitlement is established. (Paras 9, 10)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an Arbitrator due to disputes arising from three contracts, all containing arbitration clauses. The petitioner invoked arbitration but faced objections from the respondents regarding compliance with procedural requirements.

Findings of Court:
The Court found that all contracts were interlinked and that the objections raised by the respondents lacked merit. The Court appointed an Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes.

Issues: The main issues included whether the petitioner complied with Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act and the appropriateness of filing under both Sections 11 and 15.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court ruled that the existence of arbitration clauses was sufficient for appointment, and procedural missteps did not preclude relief if the petitioner demonstrated entitlement.

Result: Petition allowed, Arbitrator appointed.

ORDER :

Abdul Quddhose, J.

This petition has been filed under Section 11 of the the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 , seeking for appointment of an Arbitrator by this Court.

2. There seems to be a dispute between the petitioner and the respondent arising out of the following contracts:

(a) Invoice based Financing Facility Agreement dated 01.04.2022

(b) Supplemental Deed cum Modification Agreement dated 04.05.2023

(c) Supplemental deed of Hypothecation dated 09.05.2023

3. According to the petitioner certain sums of money are due and payable by the respondent to the petitioner under the aforementioned contracts. There are arbitration clauses in all the aforementioned contracts and the same are extracted hereunder.

(a) Arbitration Clause in Invoice based Financing Facility Agreement dated 01.04.2022.

"23. Arbitration:

All disputes differences and/or claims arising out of this Agreement whether during its subsistence or thereafter shall be settled by Arbitration in accordance with the provisions of the Arbitration Act 1996 and shall be referred to the Sole Arbitration of an Arbitrator nominated by the Lender. The award given by such Arbitrator shall be final and binding on all parties to this Agreement. In the event of an appointed arbitrator dying or being unable or unwilling to act as arbitrator for any reason, the Lender, o such death of the arbitrator or his inability or unwillingness to act as arbitrator, shall appoint another person to act as arbitrator. Such person shall be entitled to proceed with the reference from the stage it is left by his predecessor. The venue of arbitration proceedings shall be at Chennai and the Borrower agrees to proceed with the reference from the stage it is left by his predecessor. The venue of arbitration proceedings shall be at Chennai and the Borrower agrees to a fast track arbitration to be disposed of within 90 days from the date of reference.

(b) Arbitration Clause in Supplemental Deed cum Modification Agreement dated 04.05.2023

16. Arbitration & Jurisdiction

i) If any dispute, difference, or claim arises between any of the Borrowers and the Company in connection with the Facility or as to the interpretation, validity, implementation, or effect of facility Documents or as the rights and liabilities of the parties under the Facility Documents or alleged breach of the Facility Documents or anything is done or omitted to be done under the Facility Documents, the same shall be settled by arbitration by a sole arbitrator to be appointed by any of the following institutions.

(c) Arbitration Clause in Supplemental deed of Hypothecation dated 09.05.2023

25. All disputes, differences and /or claims arising out of this Agreement whether during its subsistence or thereafter shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and shall be referred to the sole arbitration of an arbitrator nominated by the Lender. The Award given by such arbitrator shall be final and binding on all parties to this Agreement. In the event of an appointed arbitrator dying or being unable or unwilling to act as arbitrator for any reason, the Lender, on such death of the arbitrator or his inability or unwillingness to act as arbitrator, shall appoint another person to act as arbitrator. Such person shall be entitled to proceed with the reference from the stage it is left by his predecessor. The venue of arbitration proceedings shall be at Chennai. The Borrower agrees to a fast track Arbitration to be disposed within 90 days from the date of reference.

4. According to the petitioner, the Arbitration Clauses found in the aforementioned contracts are also applicable to the Deed of Hypothecation dated 04.05.2023. The petitioner has invoked arbitration clause by issuing notice to the respondents on 19.09.2023 as per Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. Thereafter, the petitioner, as per arbitration clause approached Council for National and International Commerci

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top