Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mrs. Justice J.Nisha Banu, Mr. Justice R.Sakthivel, JJ
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Latha – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
R. SAKTHIVEL, J.
Feeling aggrieved by the Award dated July 13, 2020, passed by the ‘Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Subordinate Judge), Vaniyambadi’ (‘Tribunal’ for short) in M.C.O.P.Nos.125 and 126 of 2014, the second respondent therein / Insurance Company, namely the Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co Ltd., has preferred these Civil Miscellaneous Appeals challenging its liability and the quantum of compensation.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties will hereinafter be referred to as per their rank in the Motor Claims Original Petition [M.C.O.P.].
3. Case of petitioners in both the Claim Petitions i.e., M.C.O.P. Nos.125 & 126 of 2014, is that:
(i) On September 29, 2012, at about 4.30 am., the husband of the first petitioner in M.C.O.P. No.126 of 2014, namely Saravanan was driving a lorry bearing Registration No.TN-23-BZ-6126 belonging to the third respondent in M.C.O.P.No.125 of 2014, along with an additional driver, namely Theerthakumar, the petitioner in M.C.O.P.No.125 of 2014.
(ii) While nearing Gahonge Village on Mumbai to Pune Express Highway service road, the first respondent being the driver of the lorry bearing Registration No.MH-11-AL-6975, had stationed the
The court established that negligence in parking without indication led to liability for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, with a modified award based on notional income.
The court recalculated compensation based on actual income and confirmed liability for the accident rested solely with the third respondent, dismissing claims against others.
The insurer is liable for compensation when the identified tort-feasor is negligent, and claimants cannot choose to pursue unidentified tort-feasors.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the determination of liability and quantum of compensation under the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988.
The court established that both the Tanker Lorry driver and the deceased contributed to the accident, attributing 85% negligence to the driver, while also correcting the compensation calculation base....
The court enhanced the compensation for death in a motor accident, establishing the deceased's notional income and confirming the negligence of the Lorry driver.
Liability for motor accident compensation determined based on the driver’s negligent actions, with the court emphasizing contributory negligence principles and proper evaluation of income for compens....
Negligence in motor vehicle accident is determined by evidence establishing the driver at fault. Compensation should reflect notional income and future prospects based on qualifications and age.
The court upheld the Tribunal's finding of negligence by the deceased driver in a fatal accident and confirmed the compensation awarded, modifying one claim due to underestimation of income.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
