IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C. SARAVANAN, J.
Arun Mammen & Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
The Deputy Director of Income Tax (Investigation), Chennai & Ors. - Respondents
W.P.Nos.1153, 1159, 1162 and 1164 of 2021 and W.M.P.Nos.1293, 1295, 1299, 1304, 1305 and 1306 of 2021
Decided On : 02-01-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conclusion and order of court. (Para 1 , 38) |
| 2. writ petitions filed to quash notices. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. settlement commission decisions and implications. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. contentions regarding the pending proceedings. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 16) |
| 5. analysis of relevant legal provisions. (Para 13 , 14 , 18 , 19 , 27) |
| 6. background on income tax compliance. (Para 15 , 20 , 21) |
| 7. assessment of legal compliance and previous rulings. (Para 17) |
| 8. ruling on progress of notices. (Para 22 , 24 , 28 , 29) |
| 9. application of the black money act's provisions. (Para 26 , 35) |
| 10. court's previous findings on the matter. (Para 30 , 32 , 33) |
| 11. final judgment on the legality of the impugned notices. (Para 34 , 36 , 37) |
ORDER :
By this Common Order, all these Writ Petitions are being disposed of.
2. These Writ Petitions have been filed by the respective petitioners for a Writ of Certiorari, to quash the Impugned Notice dated 27.02.2018 issued under Section 10 (1) of the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015 and all further Consequential Notices dated 03.03.2020, 16.10.2020 and 26.12.2020 and for a Writ of Prohibition, to prohibit the respondents from proceeding further with the aforesaid notices issued to the respective petitioners.
3. The said Act came into force on 01.07.2015. Even prior to the Act came into force on 01.07.2015, the respective petitioners appeared to have received notices under Section 131 of the INCOME TAX ACT , 1961 for the Assessment Years 2005-2006 to 2011-2012. Under these circumstances, the respective petitioners filed Return of Income for the Assessment Years 2005-2006 to 2011-2012 on 21.05.2015.
4. The respective petitioners opted to settle the dispute before the Income Tax Settlement Commission (ITSC) by filing Statement of Facts on 10.07.2015. This was about few days after the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015 came into force with effect from 01.07.2015.
5. By an order dated 30.06.2015, the Settlement Commission rejected the applications. Under these circumstances, the respective petitioners once again filed fresh applications on 10.07.2015 before the Settlement Commission which were again rejected by the Settlement Commission on 15.07.2015 on the ground that the income which are liable to tax under the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015 cannot be settled under Chapter XIX-A (19-A) of the INCOME TAX ACT , 1961.
6. Under these circumstances, the respective petitioners approached this Court in W.P.No.22216 of 2015 and W.P.No.22219 of 2015. By an Order dated 21.06.2016, this Court was pleased to allow the above Writ Petitions with the following observations:-
“7. In the light of the above stand taken which is based on the Explanatory Note dated 02.07.2015 issued in Circular No.12 of 2015, as the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income Tax and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015 comes into effect from 01.07.2015 and the petitioners had filed their Return of Income on 21.05.2015 and notice was issued under Section 148 of the INCOME TAX ACT by the Assessing Officer on 29.05.2015 which is before coming into effect of the provisions of the Black Money Act, 2015, the applications submitted by the petitioners before the Commission are maintainable.
8. Accordingly, the Writ Petitions are allowed and the impugned orders are set aside and the petitioners are directed to file an application before the Income Tax Settlement Commission, which shall be considered by the Commission in accordance with the provisions of the Act. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.”
7. Pursuant to the Directions of this Court dated 21.06.2016 in W.P.No.22216 of 2015 and W.P.No.22219 of 2015, the Settlement Commission passed an Order dated 06.12.2017 on merits and thus, rejected the applications filed by the respective petitioners to settle the dispute und
The continuation of proceedings under the Black Money Act is impermissible where tax compliance has been established before the Act's enforcement.
: Assessment – In an application under S.245C of Act, for settlement of applicant's income-tax case, there should be disclosure of income not earlier disclosed before the Assessing Officer
The court affirmed that the Settlement Commission's findings are conclusive unless there are grave procedural defects, emphasizing the limited scope of judicial review over such orders.
Prosecution under the Black Money Act can proceed without prior assessment, provided there is prima facie evidence of an attempt to evade taxes.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the Settlement Commission's authority to consider undisclosed income and loans not found during the search operation, and the treatment of loans as....
Additional disclosures of income during pendency of Settlement Commission, which were not made available at time of application by assessee under Section 254C of Act there is a sufficient cause to re....
The court established that rights to file settlement applications under the Income Tax Act remain valid if the search occurred before the abolition of the Settlement Commission.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.