SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 3964

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
T. Pratheeba - Petitioner 
Versus 
The Inspector General of Registration, Registration Department and Ors. – Respondents
W.P (MD). No.331 of 2025 and W.M.P(MD) No.225 of 2025
Decided On : 07-01-2025 

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. G. Aravinthan for M/S.Aran Legal Consultancy
For the Respondents: Mr. S.P. Maharajan, Special Government Pleader.

Unapproved plots cannot be registered under the Registration Act without proper regularization according to state guidelines.

Headnote:(A) Registration Act, 1908 - Section 22-A - Writ petition challenging refusal to register sale deed of unapproved plot on grounds of regulatory barriers - Court confirms legality of registration refusal, emphasizing that unapproved plots cannot be registered without proper regularization as per state guidelines. (Paras 1, 5, 9)

(B) Regularization of Unapproved Plots and Layouts Rules, 2017 - Applicability and criteria for regularization of unregistered plots established under state regulations - Clarified that only plots sold before a specific cutoff date are eligible for regularization. (Paras 7, 8)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought registration of a sale deed purportedly for an unapproved plot, previously partitioned and sold, but faced refusal under Section 22-A of the Registration Act due to regulatory non-compliance.

Findings of Court:
The court upheld the registration refusal, confirming that the petitioner failed to meet legal requirements for regularization of the property.

Issues: The key issues revolved around the applicability of Section 22-A and the conditions for registration of unapproved plots.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that the first sale of unapproved plots is prohibited from registration unless properly regularized according to state regulations, reaffirming the need for compliance with the provisions under the Registration Act.

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. refusal to register due to section 22-a (Para 1 , 4 , 5)
2. conditions for regularization of unapproved plots (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
3. consequences of non-regularization (Para 9 , 10)
4. court's final decision on the writ petition (Para 11)

ORDER :

(G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.)

This writ petition has been filed challenging the refusal check slip issued by the third respondent, dated 26.12.2024 thereby, refused to register the sale deed on the ground there is a bar under Section 22-A(2) of the REGISTRATION ACT .

2. By consent of both parties, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

3. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials placed before this Court.

4. The Punja lands to an extent of about 0.11.17 hectares (27.58 cents) being the lands situate on the western 1 acre 20 cents on the southern 3 acre 56 cents leaving the 3 cents on the North East, in the total extent of 7 acre 12 cents (2.88.25 Hectares) comprised in Survey No.887, Levinjipuram Village, Radhapuram Taluk, Tirunelveli District belong to one R.Sundaram vide Sale Deed under Document No.898 of 2016 with the Sub-Registrar of Panagudi, the third respondent herein. On 07.01.2021 the said R.Sundaram sold the said lands to one T.Ulaganathan, Devi Chandran, Srinivasan, Kala and Krishnasamy and the said Sale has been registered with the Sub-Registrar, Panagudi as Document No.87 of 2021.

5. The said T.Ulaganathan, Devi Chandran, Srinivasan, Kala and Krishnasamy partitioned the said lands and the terms of the partition were reduced to writing and the partition deed came to be registered with the third respondent as Document No.2006 of 2022. As per the said partition out of 27.58 cents comprised thereon, 10.25 cents comprised thereon in Survey No. 887 has been allotted to T.Ulaganathan. The petitioner approached the said T.Ulaganathan towards purchase of the said lands to an extent of 10.25 cents allotted to him vide partition deed in document number 2006/2022, dated 12.05.2022. The said sale deed was presented for registeration, however, it was refused to register the same on the ground that there is a bar under Section 22-A of the REGISTRATION ACT .

6. On perusal of the order impugned in this writ petition revealed that already there was an audit objection in respect of registration of the partition deed by the petitioner's vendor and another. In respect of its sub division into house plots the provision under Section 22-A of the REGISTRATION ACT was inserted by the Tamil Nadu Amendment Act 2 of 2009 with effect from 20.10.2016. It is relevant to extract Section 22-A of the Act hereunder:-

“22-A. Refusal to register certain documents .—

Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, the registering officer shall refuse to register any of the following documents, namely:—

(1) instrument relating to the transfer of immovable properties by way of sale, gift, mortgage, exchange or lease,—

(i) belonging to the State Government or the local authority or Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority established under section 9-A of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971;

(ii) belonging to, or given or endowed for the purpose of, any religious institution to which the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 is applicable;

(iii) donated for Bhoodan Yagna and vested in the Tamil Nadu State Bhoodan Yagna Board established under section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Bhoodan Yagna Act, 1958; or

(iv) of Wakfs which are under the superintendence of the Tamil Nadu Wakf Board established under the Wakf Act, 1995, unless a sanction in this regard issued by the competent authority as provided under the relevant Act or in the absence of any such authority, an authority so authorised by the State Government for this purpose, is produced before the registering officer;

(2) instrument relating to the transfer of ownership of lands converted as house sites without the permission for development of such land from

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top