Back
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
MS.JUSTICE R. POORNIMA, J
D. Dayrvin – Appellant
Versus
Secretary, School Education Department – Respondent
ORDER :
(R. POORNIMA, J.)
This Writ Petition is filed by the petitioner with a prayer to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to order made in Na.Ka.No.5432/AA2/2015 dated 27.05.2016 signed on 06.06.2016 passed by the 3rd respondent and quash the same and consequentially direct the 3rd respondent to approve the appointment of the petitioner from the date of his appointment namely 04.06.2007 onwards instead of 12.06.2009 and also direct the 3rd respondent to disburse the back wages and monetary benefits of the petitioner for the period from 04.06.2007 to 11.06.2009.
2. The brief facts of the case are as follows :
(a) The petitioner have completed his B.P.Ed., in Annamalai University during the year 2005 and completed his M.P.Ed., in the same University during the year 2005– 07. He was appointed as Physical Education Director in Pius XI Higher Secondary School by the fourth respondent. The fourth respondent School initially was a High School and thereafter, it was upgraded during the academic year 1981–82 as a Higher Secondary School. When the said school was functioning as High School two Physical Education Teachers were working. After upgradation
The court ruled that the petitioner was entitled to approval of his appointment as Physical Education Director from 04.06.2007, as the school met the eligibility criteria and he possessed the necessa....
Grant-in-aid is not automatic and depends on various factors, and appointments must comply with relevant government orders and staff fixation rules.
Judicial review mandates that authorities must comply with court directives and provide detailed justifications for administrative decisions regarding staff appointments, particularly in educational ....
Denial of promotion based on accepted qualifications is arbitrary and violates principles of natural justice.
The qualifications for appointment must be judged by the rules in force at the time of selection, not by subsequent amendments.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the petitioner, as a teacher in a private school, was entitled to receive salary and continuity of service for the period she worked, and t....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
