SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 4111

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.
M.Ramesh - Appellant  
Versus 
The Director General of Police - Respondent 
W.P.(MD)No.20664 of 2021
Decided on : 27-01-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.G.Thalaimutharasu
For the Respondents: Mr.D.Gandhiraj,  Special Government Pleader

Acquittal in a criminal case does not bar disciplinary action if misconduct is established on a preponderance of probabilities.

Headnote:(A) Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 1998 - Sections 4(1) - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 294B, 323, 353, 506(1) - Disciplinary action against police constable - Petitioner removed from service based on misconduct including unauthorized absence and physical assault on superiors - Acquittal in criminal case does not impact disciplinary proceedings - The Supreme Court ruled that strict burden of proof in criminal cases is not applicable in disciplinary actions. (Paras 7 and 8)

(B) Disciplinary Proceedings - The mere acquittal of an employee does not preclude disciplinary action if misconduct is established on a preponderance of probabilities. (Paras 8)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a police constable, faced removal from service due to unauthorized absences and physical altercations with superiors, leading to criminal charges. The petitioner was acquitted in the criminal case, but disciplinary action was upheld.

Findings of Court:
The court upheld the disciplinary action, emphasizing the importance of discipline in the police force.

Issues: The court addressed whether the acquittal in the criminal case affected the validity of disciplinary action.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that acquittal in a criminal case does not negate the findings in a disciplinary proceeding, which requires a lower standard of proof.

Result: Writ Petition dismissed.

ORDER :

Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner, Mr. Thalaimutharasu, the learned Special Government Pleader, Mr. D.Gandhiraj for the respondents and carefully perused the materials available on record.

2. The petitioner was appointed as Grade-II Police Constable on 01.03.2009 and was posted with the Tamil Nadu Special Police's 1st Battalion stationed at Trichy. Thereafter, he was transferred from Tamil Nadu Special Police and was posted at the Trichy City Armed Reserve on 10.08.2011. On 08.11.2016, the petitioner was transferred to Nilgiri's Armed Reserve. While the petitioner was attached with the Armed Reserve Unit of Nilgiri's District, he was directed to undergo State Disaster Response Forced Training at Trichy District Armed Reserve and was relieved from the Armed Reserve Nilgiri's at 18 hours with a direction to report for training. The petitioner reported for training at Trichy TN CS Training School on 03.04.2017 at 10 hours. The petitioner was scheduled to fall in line by 6 a.m., for training, but turned up at 6.30 a.m. When the course trainer and the Sub-Inspector questioned the petitioner, it is claimed by the department that the petitioner abused the Sub-Inspector, Kathiresan and behaved disrespectfully.

3. Thereafter, the petitioner was relieved from training on 11.04.2017 at 7 hours and was sent back with a passport to report duty at the Armed Reserve Nilgiri's Unit. However, instead of reporting duty at Nilgiri's Armed Reserve, the petitioner remained absent without intimating to his superiors. The petitioner on his own volition without following the procedure availed medical leave from 11.04.2017 to 30.05.2017. He further availed medical leave without permission from 12.07.2017 to 10.08.2017 without any authorization. On 08.08.2017, he went to the Trichy Armed Reserved and entered into a wordy quarrel with Sub-Inspector one Mahendran, as a result of which, a First Information Report in Crime No. 628 of 2017 under Sections 294B, 323, 353, 506(1) IPC read with the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 1998 and under Section 4(1) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act was registered as against the petitioner on 08.08.2017 and was arrested and remanded to judicial custody in Trichy Central Prison from 08.08.2017 to 12.10.2017.

4. In view of the series of the above narrated incidents, the petitioner was placed under suspension from 08.08.2017 afternoon. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Armed Reserve, Nilgiris conducted a preliminary enquiry. Based on the preliminary enquiry, six charges were framed as against the petitioner under Rule 3B in PR No.3204 of 2017. The enquiry officer concluded all the charges as against the petitioner as proved and on the basis of the findings of the enquiry officer, the Superintendent of Police, Nilgiris/third Respondent removed the petitioner from service in his proceedings in H1/PR No. 204/2017 dated 12.01.2018. The petitioner preferred an appeal to the Deputy Inspector General of Police and the same was considered by the Deputy Inspector General of Police, that is, the second respondent and the punishment enforced by the third respondent was confirmed on appeal by the second respondent vide impugned proceedings in Na.Ka.No. D2/1411/2018 dated 14.03.2018 against which the petitioner preferred a mercy petition before the Director General of Police/first respondent and the first respondent by impugned proceedings in RC No. 690-196/AP.1(1)/2020 dated 02.03.2020 confirmed the same. Challenging all the three proceedings passed by the third respondent, second respondent and first respondent confirming the removal of the petitioner from service, this writ petition is filed.

5. The charges framed as against the petitioner in brief are as follows:

(i) The petitioner failed to appear for training at 06:00 am. on 11-4-2021 at Tamil Nadu Commando School at Trichy and instead presented himself at the grounds at 6:30 a.m., under the influence of alcohol.

(ii) The petitioner availed medic

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top