SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 4161

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS 
R.SURESH KUMAR, C.SARAVANAN, JJ.
The Government of Tamil Nadu - Appellant 
Versus 
Ramawamy Tamil College, Represented by its Secretary, Mr.PR.Veerappan - Respondent 
W.A.No.2348 of 2024 and C.M.P.No.16529 of 2024
Decided on : 27-01-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For Appellants : Mr.D.Ravichandar, Special Government Pleader
For Respondent: Mr.E.Martin Jaya Kumar

Executive orders cannot override statutory provisions governing Private Aided Educational Institutions, affirming their right to fill Group-D posts.

Headnote:(A) G.O.(Ms)No.49, Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department, dated 14.05.2002 - Private Aided Colleges - Group-D posts - The writ Court quashed G.O.(Ms)No.49, stating it does not apply to Private Aided Institutions, which are governed by separate legislation. (Paras 8, 30)

(B) Executive Orders - The applicability of executive orders to Private Educational Institutions is questioned, leading to the conclusion that such orders cannot override statutory provisions. (Paras 25, 27)

Facts of the case:
The respondent, a Private Aided College, sought approval for filling Group-D posts after receiving permission from the Directorate of Collegiate Education. The proposal was rejected based on G.O.(Ms)No.49, which mandates outsourcing of such posts.

Findings of Court:
The Court held that G.O.(Ms)No.49 does not apply to Private Aided Educational Institutions and directed the Department to reconsider the proposal for appointment approvals.

Issues: The main issues were whether G.O.(Ms)No.49 applies to Private Aided Colleges and the validity of the rejection of the College's proposal based on this order.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court reasoned that G.O.(Ms)No.49 cannot be applied to Private Aided Institutions governed by specific legislation, thus upholding the College's right to fill Group-D posts.

Result: The appeal was disposed of with directions to reconsider the proposal for appointment approvals.

JUDGMENT :

R.SURESH KUMAR, J.

This intra Court appeal has been directed against the order passed by the writ Court dated 21.12.2023 in W.P.No.29647 of 2023.

2. That the respondent/writ petitioner is a Private Aided College, namely, Ramasamy Tamil College at Karaikudi. It has got various sanctioned teaching and non-teaching posts.

3. Insofar as non-teaching posts are concerned, there are four Group-D posts called one Gardner, one Watchman, one Scavenger and one Sweeper. Those posts since have become vacant, in order to fill-up these posts, the College Management sought permission from the appellant Department on 17.08.2022, having considered the said request made by the College, the Directorate of Collegiate Education, i.e., second appellant, vide its communication dated 03.11.2022 had accorded permission to fill-up these posts.

4. Pursuant to such permission granted by the concerned authority, the appointment orders were issued to fill-up the three posts on 19.04.2023 and one post on 28.04.2023, therefore, all together all the four posts have been filled up by two separate orders.

5. After having filled up these posts, proposal had been sent on 22.05.2023 by the College Management to the second appellant, i.e., the Director of Collegiate Education for giving such approval.

6. However, the second appellant had rejected the said proposal for giving approval by citing the reason that, as per the Government Order in G.O.(Ms)No.49, Personnel and Administrative Reforms (F) Department dated 14.05.2002, these kind of Group-D posts shall not be filled up on permanent basis instead as per the decision taken by the Government which is reflected in G.O.(Ms)No.49, these Group-D posts shall be engaged by outsourcing on private basis.

7. The said reason has been given in the rejection order, challenging the same, the College Management had approached this Court seeking prayer of writ of declaration to declare that, G.O.(Ms)No.49 dated 14.05.2002 and the consequential letter dated 05.06.2023 issued by the first respondent in the writ petition and the consequential letter issued by the third respondent in the writ petition dated 19.09.2023 are not applicable or has no relevancy to the Aided Private Colleges to appoint Group-D Employees and consequently direct the third respondent in the writ petition to grant approval for the appointment of Group-D Employees, namely, Gardener, Watchman, Sweeper and Scavenger who had already been appointed in the sanctioned vacancies.

8. The said prayer having been considered, the writ Court by order dated 21.12.2023 has allowed the said writ petition and in fact the learned Judge has gone to the extent of quashing G.O.(Ms)No.49 itself along with the consequent and connected communications as sought for in the prayer of the writ petition.

9. Even though a writ of declaration has been sought to declare that G.O.(Ms)No.49 will have no application to the Private Aided Institutions like the respondent/writ petitioner College, the writ Court has reasons which has been recorded in the order and quashed G.O.(Ms)No.49 dated 14.05.2002.

10. Assailing the said order, Mr.D.Ravichandar, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the appellants would contend that, insofar as the policy decision that has been taken by the Government which is reflected in G.O.(Ms)No.49 is concerned, in order to streamline the heavy expenditure being incurred by the Government for these kind of Group-D posts, the Expenditure Reforms Commission has been appointed to make a recommendation on outsourcing of services of certain employees in the Government Department.

11. The Government also constituted the Staff and Expenditure Reforms Commission to examine the scope for curtailing avoidable expenditure in the administration. The Commission has submitted an interim report to the Government. One of the recommendations of the commission is that, it relates to outsourcing of services like Sweeping, Scavenging, Cleaning, Watch and ward etc., therefore, the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top