SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 4163

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
G.Ilangovan, J.
Selvaraj - Appellant
Vs.
The Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption Wing, Thanjavur - Respondent 
Crl.A(MD)No.151 of 2018
Decided On : 22-01-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.S.Venkatesan
For the Respondent: Mr.R.Meenakshi Sundaram Additional Public Prosecutor

Police officials cannot exceed their authority by involving themselves in civil disputes and demanding bribes, which is prohibited under the Prevention of Corruption Act.

Headnote:(A) Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) - Criminal Appeal against conviction for demanding bribe by police officials - Accused committed offences under the Act while improperly involving themselves in a civil matter - Court found overwhelming evidence from the complainant and witnesses regarding the bribe demand and acceptance. (Paras 2, 29, 72, 77)

Facts of the case:
The appellant was convicted for soliciting a bribe from a complainant in a civil dispute involving his sister. The complainant was coerced into making payments to the police officials for settling the matter. (Paras 2-6)

Findings of Court:
Evidence established presence of demand and acceptance of a bribe, confirming that the accused improperly engaged in a civil issue and unlawfully solicited payments from the complainant. (Paras 76, 78)

Issues: The case primarily focused on the legality of police involvement in a civil matter and whether the demand for illegal gratification was substantiated. (Paras 34, 77)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that police officers exceeded their authority by soliciting bribes in civil cases and upheld the conviction due to substantial evidence corroborating the complainant's claims. (Paras 76, 77)

Result: Criminal appeal dismissed, confirming conviction and sentence.

Table of Content
1. conviction under prevention of corruption act (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. prosecution's evidence of illegal gratification (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. trap procedures and evidence (Para 8 , 54 , 55 , 62 , 63)
4. details of bribe demand and its evidence (Para 9 , 39 , 46)
5. review of police misconduct in civil matters (Para 10 , 26)
6. arguments surrounding the validity of evidence and judgments (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 75)
7. sanction for prosecution validity (Para 72 , 73)
8. affirmation of trial court's judgment (Para 76 , 77)

JUDGMENT :

G.Ilangovan, J.

This Criminal Appeal is filed against the conviction and sentence imposed by the Special Court-cum -Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thanjavur at Kumbakonam in Special Case No.61 of 2014, dated 14/03/2018.

2.The case of the prosecution in brief:-

The first accused was working as Inspector, second accused as Head Constable and third accused as Sub Inspector of Police in the Ayyampettai Police Station during 2003. On 01/03/2003, the de-facto complainant gave a complaint against his sister Mallika with regard to civil dispute between them. It was received by the police officials, for which, receipt was given in CSR No.81 of 2003. That was enquired by the police officials. Again, on 31/05/2003 the de-facto complainant gave another complaint, which was also received and CSR No.198 of 2003 was issued. On 06/07/2003 at about 09.30 am, when the accused person enquired the complaint, they demanded illegal gratification of Rs.3,000/-, of which Rs.2,000/- for the first and second accused and Rs.1,000/- for the third accused. Subsequently reiterated the demand on 18/07/2003, 21/07/2003 and 23/07/2023 at the Ayyampettai Police Station for settling the civil dispute prevailing between the complainant and his sister Mallika. Not willing to bribe, the de-facto complaint lodged a complaint with the respondent. Based upon the complaint, trap was laid. Case in Crime No.14 of 2003 was registered for the offence section 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act. The accused was arrested in the trap. After completing the formalities of the investigation, final report was filed. It was taken on file by the Special Judge-cum-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thanjavur @ Kumbakonam in Special Case No.8 of 2004 for the offences under sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act. After completing 207 Cr.P.C proceedings, framed the following charges against the accused persons:-

(i)The accused persons were working as Police Officials in the Ayyampettai Police Station during 2003; On 01/03/2003 the de-facto complainant gave a complaint against his Sister Mallika with regarding civil dispute between them; That was enquired by the police officials; Again on 31/05/2003, the de-facto complainant gave another complaint, which was also received and enquired by them; On 06/07/2003 at about 09.30 am, when the accused person enquired the complaint, they demanded illegal gratification of Rs.3,000/- and subsequently reiterated the demand on 18/07/2003, 21/07/2003 and 23/07/2023 in the Ayyampettai Police Station for settling a civil dispute prevailing between the complainant and his sister Mallika and thereby, the accused committed an office under section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; and

(ii)In the course of same transaction, the accused persons by using their official position as public servant, obtained Rs.3,000/- as pecuniary advantage for themselves from the complainant and thereby the accused committed an offence under section 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

3. To that charges, the accused pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. Thereafter, the case was transferred to Special Court, Trichy and taken on file as Special Case No.48 of 2012. During trial process, as per the direction of this court, it was transferred to Special Court-cum-CJM Court, Thanjavur @ Kumbakonam and taken on file in Special Case No.61 of 2014

4. During the trial process, on the side of the pro

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top