SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 4184

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
J.Nisha Banu, R.Sakthivel, JJ
Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Co.Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Dhakshinamoorthy – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Parties : M/s. R. Sreevidhya, Mr. K. Myilsamy.

JUDGMENT :

(R. SAKTHIVEL, J.)

Feeling aggrieved by the Award passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Special District Judge, Tiruppur (‘Tribunal’ for short) in M.C.O.P.No.896 of 2017 dated December 19, 2019, the second respondent therein / Insurance company preferred this CMA.No.1515 of 2020, while the petitioner / claimant therein preferred Cross Objection No.86 of 2021 praying to enhance the compensation. This Common Judgment will now decide both, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal and the Cross Objection.

2.For the sake of convenience, the parties herein will be referred to as per their rank in the Motor Claim original Petition.

3.The Insurance Company filed this appeal questioning the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal; therefore, there is no need to deal with the aspect of liability.

Petitioner’s case

4.The case of the petitioner is that on January 31, 2017, at about 09.00 hours, while the petitioner was riding a motorcycle bearing registration No.TN 37 M 6186 from south to north on the Avinashi to Naduvacheri Road, near Ravuthampalayam Bus Stop, Avinashi, the first respondent was riding the motorcycle bearing registration No.TN-39-BY- 5558 in a rash and negligent ma

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top