SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 4193

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT 
R.Subramanian, L.Victoria Gowri, JJ.
B.Siva Sankari - Appellant 
Versus 
The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Department of School Education and ors. – Respondent 
W.A(MD)Nos.559 and 560 of 2022 and C.M.P.(MD)Nos.4875 and 4877 of 2022
Decided On : 20-01-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.G.Thalaimutharasu
For the Respondent:Mr.R.Baskaran, Additional Advocate General, Assisted by, Mr.S.P.Maharajan, Special Government Pleader, Mr.K.R.Laxman

The court emphasized the necessity to consider prior judicial orders and the long service of teachers when determining staff approvals, ruling against dismissals based on surplus declarations without proper evaluation.

Headnote:(A) Education Act - Staff fixation - Writ appeals against dismissal of petitions for approval of appointments as Secondary Grade Teachers - Appellants appointed in 2010, but approvals pending due to surplus posts - Court directed fresh proposal for approval based on current staff strength - Previous orders not considered in dismissal. (Paras 3, 12, 14)

(B) Writ Jurisdiction - Scope of judicial review - Court emphasized the need to consider prior orders and the long service of the appellants in the school without salary - Directions issued for compliance with the court's earlier orders. (Paras 10, 14)

Facts of the case:
The appellants were appointed as Secondary Grade Teachers in 2010 but faced delays in approval due to staff fixation declaring surplus posts. They filed writ petitions challenging the fixation and sought approval for their appointments.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the learned single judge dismissed the writ petitions without considering prior orders and directed the school to submit a fresh proposal for the appellants' approval.

Issues: The main issues were whether the appointments were valid despite surplus declarations and the consideration of previous court orders in the dismissal of the writ petitions.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the learned single judge erred in dismissing the petitions without considering the long service of the appellants and the implications of previous orders regarding staff fixation.

Result: Writ appeals allowed; directions issued for approval of appointments.

JUDGMENT :

L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.

These writ appeals are filed against the order dated 19.05.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court, dismissing the writ petitions filed by the respective writ petitioners, namely, B.Siva Sankari and R.Tamil Selvi, challenging the impugned staff fixation made by the respondent authorities with respect to TELC Middle School, Peraiyur road, Usilampatti, Madurai District, and further seeking to direct the respondent authorities to approve the appointment of the respective writ petitioners in the aforesaid TELC Middle School as Secondary Grade Teachers.

2.One Secondary Grade Teacher post fell vacant on 13.01.2010 in the 5th respondent school due to the resignation of the then incumbent, one V.Veni on 12.01.2010 and in the said vacancy B.Siva Sankari was appointed on 01.07.2010. The school submitted a proposal to DEEO on 13.07.2011, requesting to approve the appointment. Another post of Secondary Grade Teacher fell vacant on 02.07.2010 due to the transfer of the then incumbent, one M. Rajeshwari, on 01.07.2010, to another school under the same management, namely, Y.M.C.C Middle School, Madurai. In that vacancy, the school appointed one R.Tamil Selvi as Secondary Grade Teacher with effect from 02.07.2010. The school submitted the proposal on 13.07.2011, requesting to approve the appointment of one R.Tamil Selvi.

3.In the meanwhile, the second respondent/ DEEO without approving the appointment of the appellants herein, finalized the staff fixation for the 5th respondent school for the academic years 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 on 13.12.2010, in which one post of Secondary Grade Teacher was rendered as surplus for the academic year 2009-2010. However, for the academic year 2010-2011, two posts of Secondary Grade Teachers were rendered surplus in the 5th respondent school. Hence, the 5th respondent school submitted a representation requesting the 2nd respondent to re-consider and re-fix the staff strength on 07.01.2011. Since the 5th respondent school's proposal to approve the appointment of the appellants herein was kept pending by the second respondent, the appellants herein filed the writ petitions in W.P.(MD)Nos.18856 and 18857 of 2017 respectively, challenging the staff fixation dated 13.12.2010 and further praying to direct the District Elementary Educational Officer to approve the appointment of the appellants / petitioners as Secondary Grade Teachers with effect from their date of appointment. Relying upon the full bench judgment in the case of Director of Elementary Education vs. Thirumathi. S.Vigila reported in 2006 5 CTC 385, the learned single judge dismissed the writ petitions for the reason that when the posts are declared as surplus, the school is not entitled to fill up the posts and concluded that the appointments of both the teachers are not in accordance with law by the impugned order dated 19.05.2022.

4.The impugned staff fixation for the academic years 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 was finalized by the second respondent by proceedings dated 13.12.2010. In the said proceedings for the academic year 2009-2010, one Secondary Grade Teacher post has been rendered surplus, and for the academic year 2010-2011, two Secondary Grade Teacher posts have been rendered as surplus. Challenging the said staff fixation, the 5th respondent school filed a writ petition in W.P.(MD)No.7698 of 2014 and this Court, by order dated 20.08.2019, disposed of the aforesaid writ petition, and the operative portion of the same is extracted as follows:

“The inspection report of the District Elementary Educational Officer regarding the Fixation of Staff strength is sought to be quashed in the present writ petition. Further, a direction is sought for to direct the third respondent to approve the appointments of B. Siva Sankari as Secondary Grade Teacher with effect from 01.07.2010 and R.Tamilselvi as Secondary Grade Teacher with effect from 02.07.2010.

2.The teachers, who were appointed by the writ petitioner management,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top