SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 4460

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.B.Balaji, J
S.Kalliappan – Appellant
Versus
NIL – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.A.K.Sriram Senior Counsel for Mr.A.Kowshik Raghu Rajaa

ORDER

P.B.BALAJI, J.

This revision has been filed by the petitioner in the Trust O.P.No.256 of 2019, on the file of the Principal District Judge, Kancheepuram.

2. The revision petitioner had sought for permission to sell the trust properties. The Trial Court though permitted sale, has imposed conditions for the sale and the petitioner trust, aggrieved by some of the conditions, has approached this Court by way of this civil revision petition.

3. Heard Mr.A.K.Sriram, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner. I have also gone through the records.

4. It is seen that the petitioner trust is a public charitable trust which is also duly registered in the year 2007. The petitioner trust runs a School where about 4500 students are studying. With a view to expand the School, the petitioner seeking to augment funds, decided to sell its property measuring 60 cents at Mudichoor Villagae, Tambaram Taluk. Being a public charitable trust, the petitioner thought it fit to approach the District Court to seek permission for sale of the said property. The learned District Judge, by order dated 28.10.2021, has granted permission to sell the said property. However, the petitioner is aggrieved by the imposi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top