SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 2284

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN
Zubaitha Ummal – Appellant
Versus
Sara Ummal – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. R.Vasudevan
For the Respondent: Mr. S.Mugesh

ORDER :

V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.

This Civil Revision Petition arises against the order passed by the learned District Judge, Karaikal, in I.A.No.66 of 2018 in I.A.No.178 of 2017 in O.S.No. 21 of 1993, dated 18.12.2019.

2. O.S.No.21 of 1993 is a suit for partition and separate possession.The said suit came to be dismissed by the learned Trial Judge, in and by way of a judgment and decree, dated 05.08.1997.

3. Aggrieved by the same, an appeal was preferred to this Court in A.S.No.76 of 1999. In and by way of a judgment dated 26.11.2013, the appeal was allowed and the judgment and decree of the Trial Court in O.S.No.21 of 1993 was set aside. This Court declared that the appellant / 1st plaintiff and respondents 8 to 15, who were plaintiffs 2 to 9, are entitled to partition of 42/120 share in the plaint 'A' & 'B' schedule mentioned properties. As the appeal had been allowed, liberty was granted to the appellant / 1st plaintiff and plaintiff Nos.2 to 9 / respondents 8 to 15 in the appeal, to seek for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner and for passing of a final decree.

4. After the appeal came to be allowed, the 4th respondent in the appeal, one Hadja Fakrudeen, filed an application in C

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top