Back
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
S.SRIMATHY
V.Murugesan – Appellant
Versus
V.Marimuthu – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
S. SRIMATHY, J.
The present Second Appeal is filed by the defendant in the suit to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated 25.10.2016 passed in A.S.No.53 of 2015 by the VI Additional District Court, Madurai by reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 17.06.2015 passed in O.S. No.389 of 2008 by the III Additional Sub Court, Madurai.
2. The defendant is the appellant herein and the plaintiffs 2 & 3 are the respondents herein. For the sake of convenience, the parties shall be referred to as plaintiffs and defendant as per the ranking in the suit.
3. The plaintiffs have filed O.S.No.611 of 2002 on the file of District Munsif Court, Madurai, thereafter the same was transferred and renumbered as O.S.No.294 of 2002 on the file of District Munsif Court, Thirumangalam, again transferred and renumbered as O.S.No.389 of 2008 on the file of III Additional Sub Court, Madurai.
4. The plaintiffs had filed the suit for declaration to declare that the defendant has got no common ownership in Item No.1 of the suit property, consequential prayer for mandatory injunction directing the defendant to clear the trespass and restoring the possession to the plaintiffs and permanent injunction restraini
Negative declaratory relief cannot be sought without establishing positive ownership claims under the Specific Relief Act; inadequate court fees leads to dismissal of suit.
The court emphasized that the burden of proof lies with the plaintiff to establish her title, and findings from previous litigation regarding adoption and possession are binding.
The court affirmed that the burden of proof lies with the plaintiff to establish title, and previous findings on adoption and title are binding under res judicata.
Adoption does not divest an adopted child of rights acquired through a biological parent if the property was established as independent property prior to adoption.
Adoption severs ties with the biological family, divesting the adopted son of rights to property acquired through the natural father, and the burden of proof for joint ownership lies with the claiman....
Permanent injunction cannot be granted without establishing title or possession; prior decrees do not confer title if not adjudicated.
A declaration of property ownership requires establishing possession; without it, claims regarding related deeds are insufficient.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
