SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 2431

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
Rajeswariammal (died) – Appellant
Versus
Lumdy Joe Reeba – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.C.Venkatesan

ORDER :

V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.

This Civil Revision Petition arises against the order of return of Counter Claim SR.No.10600 of 2022 in O.S.No.185 of 2020 by learned Principal District Munsif Court at Alandur, dated 05.09.2024.

2. The Civil Revision Petitioners are the defendants in the suit. O.S.No.185 of 2020 is a suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit premises. The suit premises has been described as an extent of 572 sq.ft comprised in Door No.2/33 bearing S.Nos.R.S.1622, 1623/2 and GLRS 256/213.

3. The claim of the plaintiff is that she had obtained the property from one Murali. Murali had got the property from his father Vasudevan Pillai. Vasudevan Pillai had obtained the property by way of a partition deed dated 24.04.1969. After she had acquired the said property, she wanted to demolish the existing superstructure and put up a new one. Considering that the defendants are neighbours, she constructed a temporary toilet so as to enable the defendants to enjoy the property.

4. The second defendant claimed that some of the property, which belongs to him, had been taken over by the plaintiff. Henc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top