Back
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
G.R.Swaminathan
Jagadeesan – Appellant
Versus
K.R.Nivethan – Respondent
ORDER :
G.R. Swaminathan, J.
The plaintiff in O.S No.7 of 2023 on the file of the Sub Court, Kulithalai is the revision petitioner herein. The revision petition is directed against the order dated 02.02.2024 in I.A No.2 of 2023 in the suit.
2. The case of the revision petitioner/plaintiff is as follows :
The plaintiff is the managing partner of a firm running a licensed packaged drinking water unit in Kulithalai. The defendants approached the plaintiff and expressed their interest in becoming their dealer. They, however, insisted on using their brand name “Ocean Waves”. The plaintiff entered into a dealership agreement with the defendants on 19.10.2019. Agreement was to come into force with effect from 14.11.2019 and was valid for a period of three years. It was renewed. Subsequently, the business relationship came under strain. The defendants owed a sum of Rs.7,07,332/-. The plaintiff kept ready the packaged drinking water bottles as per the defendants' specifications but the defendants did not lift them. The packed bottles are remaining in the plaintiff's premises. Since the defendants remained unresponsive, COS No.7 of 2023 was instituted on the file of the Sub Court, Kulithalai on
The court ruled that an order impacting substantial rights does not qualify as purely interlocutory, allowing revision under Article 227 despite commercial disputes being generally barred from such r....
The bar against Civil Revision Applications from interlocutory orders under Section 8 of the Commercial Courts Act is enforceable, and the requirement for pre-institution mediation was not applicable....
A Civil Revision Petition is maintainable against a final order of the Commercial Appellate Authority under Section 115 of CPC, despite the bars on appeals and revisions in the Commercial Courts Act.
The court ruled that a development agreement for agricultural land falls under Article 6 (C) of the Indian Stamp Act, requiring payment of deficit stamp duty for admissibility, and that the order is ....
The main legal principle established is the mandatory nature of pre-litigation mediation and the requirement for the suit to contemplate urgent interim relief under Section 12A of the Commercial Cour....
The question of limitation in a suit involving a sick industrial company is a mixed question of law and fact, requiring a full trial to resolve.
The court ruled that an ex-parte order is interlocutory and barred from revision under the Commercial Courts Act, but the petitioner retains the right to participate in ongoing proceedings.
A dissolved entity cannot maintain a suit as per the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, rendering any orders passed by a court lacking jurisdiction illegal.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of the definition of 'Commercial Dispute' under Section 2(1)(c-xviii) of the Act of 2015 and the prospective effect of the manda....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
