SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 4794

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
G. Kadar Sheriff – Appellant
Versus
R. Natarajan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : N. Manokaran
For the Respondent: D. Sathya

Table of Content
1. challenge to the tender process regarding emd exemption. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. counterarguments regarding applicability of government order. (Para 5 , 6)
3. court's analysis of government order applicability to the petitioner. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
4. court's final ruling on the writ petition. (Para 10)

ORDER :

2. Heard Mr.R.Maheswaran, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.P.Subbaraj, learned Special Government Pleader for the respondents 1, 2 and 4 and Mr.R.Sankar Ganesh, learned counsel for the respondents 5 and 6.

4. In the above tender, EMD exemption was granted and the petitioner had also participated. The same had been cancelled before finalization of the tender and a fresh tender notice was also issued on 19.11.2023, which did not provide exemption from payment of EMD and therefore, the same is not inconsonance with the policy of the Government in G.O.Ms.No.199, Finance (Salaries) Department, dated 27.06.2022. Hence, he would submit that the tender process itself is bad in law as the fifth respondent had failed to grant exemption for the MSME, which held Udhayam Registration Certificate or any other valid certificate as notified by the Government of India. Hence, he

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top