Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.JAYACHANDRAN
S. Iqbal S/o Salimaraickar – Appellant
Versus
State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Police Unit – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. registration misconduct and corruption allegations. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of the charges and accused roles. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. evidence supports collusion in document preparation. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. impact of appellant's death on the appeal. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. defense arguments regarding sanction to prosecute. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 6. analysis of evidence regarding the manipulation of property value. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 7. insufficient evidence for prosecution's claims of misconduct. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 8. foundational principles under the prevention of corruption act. (Para 24) |
| 9. outcome of appeals and implications of the judgment. (Para 25) |
JUDGMENT :
G. JAYACHANDRAN, J.
1. On 27.06.1998, the Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, Puducherry, registered a case in Crime No.3 of 1998 against Thiru.S.Balasundaram and four others, based on the complaint received from Thiru.Veeraraghavan, District Registrar, Register Office, Pondicherry, addressed through Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Unit, Pondicherry.
2. The complaint disclosed that, Inter Department enquiry conducted had brought to light that, Balasundaram presently wor
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
