Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R.N.Manjula
Amalorpavam Higher Secondary School, Rep. by its Principal – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory of Puducherry, Rep. by the Under Secretary to Govt. (Labour), Labour Department – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's request for writ of certiorari (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. background of employment and complaints against the third respondent (Para 4) |
| 3. petitioner's arguments on code of conduct violations (Para 5) |
| 4. respondents' arguments on jurisdiction and locus standi (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. definition of employee under the pondicherry school education act (Para 8 , 9) |
| 6. code of conduct applicability to the third respondent (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 7. disciplinary action versus industrial dispute (Para 13 , 14) |
| 8. understanding section 10 of the industrial disputes act (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 9. nature of industrial disputes under sections 2(k) and 2-a (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 10. provisions of the industrial disputes act and its overriding effect (Para 21 , 22) |
| 11. disciplinary proceedings under the pondicherry school education act (Para 23 , 24) |
| 12. arguments on the inconsistency between two acts (Para 25 , 26) |
| 13. constitutional provisions regarding repugnancy (Para 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 14. special versus general legislation in labor disputes (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 15. third respondent's choice of remedy and its implications (Para 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 16. court's conclusion on the validity of the notification |
The ongoing disciplinary proceedings preclude the invocation of the Industrial Disputes Act, requiring resolution through educational legislation mechanisms.
Labour Court has decided the preliminary issue of jurisdiction raised to the effect that the Labour Court has no jurisdiction. The Labour Court has held that it has jurisdiction to entertain the refe....
The definition of 'industry' under Section 2(j) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 excludes organizations engaged in sovereign functions or those not producing goods or services for market consumpt....
Section 33 (2) of I.D. Act reads as conditions of service, etc., to remain unchanged under certain circumstances during pendency of proceedings.
Workmen of cooperative societies can raise industrial disputes under the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, despite being governed by cooperative regulations.
The court established that disputes under the Industrial Disputes Act must be resolved within its framework, and writ jurisdiction is not appropriate when an alternative remedy exists.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
