Compensation for fatal accidents must reflect actual loss of earnings and emotional impact, with appropriate multipliers applied to ensure fair restitution to claimants.

JUDGMENT :

M.Dhandapani, J.

1. This appeal has been filed by the appellants/ claimants challenging the judgment and decree passed in M.C.O.P.No.403 of 2011 dated 31.07.2013 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (First Additional Court) Erode.

2.The learned counsel appearing for the appellants submitted that on 19.03.2011 at about 4.30 p.m., the deceased Thirunavukarasu was riding as a pillion rider in the motor cycle bearing Registration No.TN 56 A 7930 driven by his friend Ranjithkumar in Villarasampatti to Kaniravutharkulam Road at Ellapalayam. At that time, the driver of the lorry bearing Registration No.TN 29 AA 3556 came in the opposite direction in a rash and negligent manner and dashed against the motorcycle, due to which, he died on the spot.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the appellants further submitted that thereafter, the parents and sisters of the deceased Thirunavukarasu/ appellants/ claimants filed claim petition before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, claiming a sum of Rs.21 Lakhs as compensation for the death of Thirunavukarasu. After adjudication, the Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs.7,20,000/- as compensation along with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from 27.04.2011, the date of filing of the petition till the date of realization with proportionate costs and directed the third respondent to deposit the compensation. Aggrieved by the same, the claimants have preferred this appeal seeking enhancement in compensation.

4.The learned counsel appearing for the appellants further submitted that the deceased was 23 years at the time of accident and he had just completed B.Sc., M.B.A. Course at Suriya Engineering College. The learned counsel further submitted that the third respondent did not dispute the negligence aspect and further submitted that the Tribunal ought to have fixed the notional monthly income of the deceased as Rs.9,000/- per month, however, the Tribunal fixed the notional monthly income of the deceased as Rs.7,500/- per month and further submitted that the correct multiplier to be adopted is 18, whereas, the Tribunal adopted the multiplier 14 and awarded compensation, which is not sustainable one and further submitted that the Tribunal awarded only a meagre sum of Rs.80,000/- towards loss of love and affection and hence, the appellants are entitled for enhanced compensation.

5.Per contra, the learned counsel appearing for the third respondent Insurance Company submitted that the Tribunal after considering all the factual aspects, awarded the compensation which is just and reasonable and hence, the impugned judgment warrants no interference.

6.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellants as well as the learned counsel appearing for the third respondent and perused the materials available on record.

7.Admittedly, on 19.03.2011 at about 4.30 p.m., the deceased Thirunavukarasu was travelled as a pillion rider in the motor cycle bearing Registration No.TN 56 A 7930 driven by his friend Ranjithkumar in Villarasampatti to Kaniravutharkulam Road at Ellapalayam. At that time, the driver of the lorry bearing Registration No.TN 29 AA 3556 came in the opposite direction in a rash and negligent manner and dashed against the motorcycle, due to which, he died on the spot.

8.The accident and the manner in which the accident happened are not disputed. This appeal has been filed only questioning the quantum of compensation. Hence, there is no need for any discussion with regard to negligence aspect.

9.The tribunal after elaborately discussing the factual aspects awarded a sum of Rs.6,30,000/- for loss of dependency, Rs.10,000/- for funeral expenses, Rs.80,000/- for