Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.VELMURUGAN, M.JOTHIRAMAN
Sivagami, W/o. Late Anbalagan – Appellant
Versus
State, Represented by The Inspector of Police, Varanjaram Police Station – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. judgment of acquittal and factual background (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 24) |
| 2. overview of the prosecution's case and witnesses (Para 5 , 30 , 31) |
| 3. arguments concerning credibility of witnesses (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 4. principle regarding burden of proof and judicial findings (Para 29 , 35) |
| 5. final order and directive for accountability (Para 36) |
JUDGMENT :
P. Velmurugan J.
This criminal appeal has been filed by the de-facto complainant against the judgment of acquittal passed by the learned III Additional District & Sessions Judge, Kallakurichi in S.C.No.295 of 2017 dated 13.11.2017 acquitting the private respondents 2 & 3/A1 & A2 of all the charges framed against them, namely, under Sections 294 (b), 302, 506(ii) IPC & Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Woman Act , 1998 against the second respondent/first accused and under (b), 324, 302 r/w 34 & of the , 1998 against the third respondent/second accused, respectively.
2. The first respondent Police laid the final report before the Judicial Magistrate, Kallakurichi against the private respondents/accused, based on the complaint given by the wife of the deceased and the case was registered in Crime No.20
The prosecution failed to prove the charges against the accused beyond reasonable doubt, leading to an initial acquittal; however, the Appellate Court found conclusive evidence establishing guilt, wa....
The testimonial weight of an injured witness, corroborated by medical evidence and consistent eyewitness accounts, warrants conviction, overriding the trial court's acquittal.
Eyewitness testimony corroborated by medical evidence can establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt in murder cases involving conspiracy and unlawful assembly.
The prosecution must prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, while minor contradictions in witness testimony should not undermine the core evidence substantiating the charges.
The court ruled that specific acts of A1 and A2 resulted in grievous injury and death; acquittal of others was justified due to insufficient evidence, emphasizing the importance of eyewitness reliabi....
Point of Law : Evidence let in by the prosecution has to be assessed carefully and cautiously and it should not be brushed aside. [Para 30]
The conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC was upheld based on credible eyewitness testimony and established motive, affirming the trial court's findings despite minor contradictions in evidence....
The appellate court affirmed that collective participation in unlawful assembly under IPC Section 149 holds all members culpable for resulting violent acts, despite minor evidential discrepancies.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
