Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.VELMURUGAN, M.JOTHIRAMAN
Narmadha – Appellant
Versus
R. Rajendran, S/o. Ramasamy – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. land acquisition proceedings initiation (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. non-compliance with interim order (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. defenses raised by appellant against contempt (Para 10) |
| 4. court's analysis on wilful disobedience (Para 11 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 5. dismissal of contempt appeal and punishment (Para 12 , 13 , 15 , 27) |
JUDGMENT :
This Contempt Appeal has been filed under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act , 1971 challenging the order dated 04.08.2023 passed by the learned Single Judge in Cont.P.No.642 of 2020, whereby the appellant, who was the second respondent in the contempt petition, was held guilty of wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.M.P.No.3683 of 2020 in W.P.No.3177 of 2020 dated 10.02.2020.
3. The writ petitioner claimed that he had purchased plots in various layouts formed in the said villages. According to him, in the approved layout plans developed by the promoters, certain portions of land had been earmarked for public purposes such as roads, streets, school, park and other public utilities and were designated as Open Space Reservation lands. It was his specific case that such OSR lands had been handed ove
The appellant committed contempt by willfully disobeying a court order directing the deposit of compensation, emphasizing the imperative for compliance with judicial directives.
A clear and categorical court order must be complied with; ambiguity cannot excuse non-compliance, as established in contempt proceedings.
Court held that non-payment of compensation to landowners results in lapse of acquisition proceedings, emphasizing the necessity of proper deposit per statutory requirements.
The court emphasized the statutory right under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act and the self-contained nature of the Act in regulating contempt proceedings.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of a final order in the contempt proceedings for an appeal to be maintainable, and the limitation on the High Court's jurisdiction ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the limitation on the appealability of a contempt Judge's order under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act and Chapter VIII Rule 5 of the Rules....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
