SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Mad) 157

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.B.BALAJI
V. Selvam – Appellant
Versus
G. Sabarinathan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. N. Manoharan
For the Respondent: Mr. R. Selvakumar

Table of Content
1. plaintiff purchased vehicle and sold it. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments on liability and ownership. (Para 6 , 7)
3. analysis of ownership and liability under motor vehicles act. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 24 , 26 , 28)
4. defining ownership and negative declarations. (Para 18 , 19 , 23)
5. court's conclusion and ordered actions. (Para 30)

JUDGMENT :

The plaintiff, aggrieved by the dismissal of O.S.No.50 of 2022 on the file of the learned Additional District Judge, Dharmapuri, is the appellant.

(a) The plaintiff is a stage carriage operator at Vellore, carrying on business under the name and style of M/s.Sri Ramajayam Bus Service. The plaintiff had purchased the suit property, which is the motor vehicle with Regn.No.TN-63-U-4845 from one D.Sathishkumar, for consideration. The plaintiff has been using the said vehicle as a spare bus to ply his permitted route, namely Vellore to Thanipadi via Thiruvannamalai. The plaintiff had mortgaged the vehicle with M/s.Sundaram Finance for a loan amount of Rs.8 lakhs on 08.06.2018. The vehicle had become old and the plaintiff, with an intention to go with a latest model motor vehicle, informed midd

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top