IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
P.V. Bhasker Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Union Bank of India Represented by its Chairman and Managing Director (Reviewing Authority) – Respondent
ORDER :
Hemant Chandangoudar, J.
The challenge in this writ petition is to the order dated 23.09.2014 passed by the Reviewing Authority / Chairman and Managing Director, Union Bank – the first respondent. By the said order, the major penalty of compulsory retirement from the services of the Bank, imposed on the petitioner by the Disciplinary Authority in terms of the order dated 10.03.2014 and upheld by the Appellate Authority in terms of the order dated 28.05.2014, was modified to the penalty of reduction in grade, i.e., from SMGS-IV to MMGS-III, fixing his basic pay at Rs.31,500/- as applicable to MMGS-III.
2. The petitioner, while serving as Chief Manager, was served with a show cause notice dated 30.10.2012 alleging the following:
i. Cash credit entries had taken place in his Joint SB Account with his wife, which were beyond his known sources of income.
ii. Transactions had taken place in the account of Shri D. Bala Ganesh (Staff), and the said transactions related to the sale of shares.
iii. Amounts had been paid, either by credit to the SB Account or by way of cash, to Shyamsunder, a customer of the Bank, from the SB Account of the petitioner (joint account with his wife).
iv. Amoun
The General Manager, Personnel, Syndicate Bank & Others vs. B.S.N. Prasad
Disciplinary Authority Cum Regional Manager and Ors. Vs.Nikunja Bihari Patnaik
Indian Oil Corporation Limited Vs. Rajendra D. Harmalkar
The disciplinary action was modified due to unsubstantiated allegations, emphasizing that personal financial transactions do not constitute misconduct unless violating conduct regulations.
Negligence in banking operations can warrant disciplinary action, but dismissal is excessive if it disproportionately impacts an employee with long service and minimal financial loss to the instituti....
Bank employees are required to maintain absolute integrity and uprightness in dealing with customer funds, and any misconduct in handling public money must be dealt with firmly.
The court found that the imposition of penalty was unjustified as there was insufficient evidence of misconduct by the bank officer under the applicable regulations.
The court established that disciplinary actions must be based on timely and substantiated allegations, and that intent to commit wrongdoing is essential for establishing misconduct in employment-rela....
The charge against an employee must be specific and not vague, and disciplinary proceedings must adhere to the statutory provisions and principles of natural justice.
Disciplinary action against employees in banking must balance serious misconduct with fair treatment principles, allowing for reconsideration of penalties based on prior service and comparative cases....
Distinct allegations against employee charged in the same transaction would be justified being based on a valid classification and no perversity or arbitrariness can be alleged in the process.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the dismissal of an employee must be proportionate to the misconduct, and in this case, the court found the dismissal to be disproportionate a....
In Banking business absolute devotion, integrity and honesty is a sine qua non for every Bank employee.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.