Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.DHANABAL
Horizon Connects Enterprises Private Limited, Represented by its Managing Director Mrs. S. Kavitha – Appellant
Versus
U1 Records Private Limited, Represented by its Director Mr. Yuvan Shankar Raja – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of contractual engagement. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondent's counterarguments regarding contractual interpretation. (Para 3) |
| 3. applicant's assertion of exclusive rights. (Para 4) |
| 4. limitations of the applicant's contractual rights. (Para 5) |
| 5. analysis of contractual terms and parties' obligations. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 6. validity of contractual clauses under arbitration context. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 7. appointment of arbitrator and conclusion of the case. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
ORDER :
P.DHANABAL, J.
This Original Application has been filed by the applicant to grant interim injunction restraining the Respondent Company, its Director-cum-Artist Mr. Yuvan Shankar Raja, and all its officers, agents, representatives, assigns or any persons claiming through or acting under them, from performing, announcing, promoting, organising or associating with any live musical performance of Mr. Yuvan Shankar Raja, within the exclusive territories of Malaysia and the United States of America, including the performances scheduled on 07.02.2026 and 14.02.2026, pending adjudication of the disputes arising out of the Artist Performance Agreement dated 08.02.2023 read with the Addendum dated 08.02.2023.
2. T
The court ruled that contractual exclusivity claims are contingent upon the specific terms and duration of the agreement, emphasizing the necessity of demonstrating a prima facie case for interim rel....
The court held that a contract of personal service is not specifically enforceable, and restrictions on trade after termination violate Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act.
Copy right of video songs – Interim injunction - No prejudice is caused to the Appellant by the impugned order. The objection to the exploitation by Respondent No.2 regarding publicity is irrelevant ....
The termination of a contract is unjustified if the alleged breach does not constitute a material breach of its terms.
A contract is not concluded until there is consensus ad idem between the parties.
The court ruled that the subsequent agreement supersedes the initial agreement, establishing jurisdiction at Bhavnagar, and the applicants failed to meet the criteria for an interim injunction.
The Plaintiff is the rightful owner of copyright in the music album 'Kamasutra - Moods of Love', with the court ruling that oral agreements regarding copyright assignments are insufficient under the ....
The Plaintiff cannot issue licenses for sound recordings without being a registered Copyright Society as per Section 33 of the Copyright Act, 1957.
Section 9 of the 1996 Act cannot be used as a tool to compel the opposite party to pay money to the claimant.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
