IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.DHANABAL, J.
Horizon Connects Enterprises Private Limited, Represented by its Managing Director Mrs. S. Kavitha – Applicant
Versus
U1 Records Private Limited, Represented by its Director Mr. Yuvan Shankar Raja – Respondent
OA (Comm. Div.) No. 67 of 2026
Decided On : 12-02-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of contractual engagement. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondent's counterarguments regarding contractual interpretation. (Para 3) |
| 3. applicant's assertion of exclusive rights. (Para 4) |
| 4. limitations of the applicant's contractual rights. (Para 5) |
| 5. analysis of contractual terms and parties' obligations. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 6. validity of contractual clauses under arbitration context. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 7. appointment of arbitrator and conclusion of the case. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
ORDER :
P.DHANABAL, J.
This Original Application has been filed by the applicant to grant interim injunction restraining the Respondent Company, its Director-cum-Artist Mr. Yuvan Shankar Raja, and all its officers, agents, representatives, assigns or any persons claiming through or acting under them, from performing, announcing, promoting, organising or associating with any live musical performance of Mr. Yuvan Shankar Raja, within the exclusive territories of Malaysia and the United States of America, including the performances scheduled on 07.02.2026 and 14.02.2026, pending adjudication of the disputes arising out of the Artist Performance Agreement dated 08.02.2023 read with the Addendum dated 08.02.2023.
2. The short facts of the application filed by the applicant are as follows:
The applicant company is engaged in the business of planning, organising, promoting, managing and conducting large scale national and international live musical performances and entertainment events. The respondent is a company representing the artist Mr. Yuvan Shankar Raja and was contractually engaged by the applicant for exclusive live musical performances in specified international territories. On 08.02.2023, the applicant company and the respondent entered into an Artist Performance Agreement followed by an Addendum dated 08.02.2023, whereby the respondent contractually granted the applicant sole and exclusive rights to organise, promote, produce and conduct all live musical performances of the said artist in the exclusive territories of Malaysia and the Unites States of America. As per the agreement, the respondent and the artists were strictly prohibited, during the subsistence of the agreement, from directly or indirectly performing, negotiating, contracting, associating or engaging with any third party for live musical performances within the said exclusive territories, without the prior written consent of the applicant company. In furtherance of the said preparations, the applicant company entered into arrangements with local facilitators and service providers in Malaysia solely for the purpose of statutory compliance, licensing of foreign artists, venue coordination, technical production and allied operational requirements, without in any manner diluting or assigning the applicant’s exclusive contractual rights. The total financial exposure incurred by the applicant company in connection with the Malaysia and USA concert series aggregates to approximately Rs.3,80,00,000/-. The receipt of substantial amounts paid by the applicant company towards the Malaysia and USA concert series was also admitted by the respondent and he acknowledged the money for a sum of Rs.57,50,000/- transferred towards Malaysia performance advance, a sum of Rs.20 lakhs received by cheque in favour of U1 Records Private Limited, a sum of Rs.29 lakhs received in a referred account and a sum of Rs.73,00,000/- received in referred accounts, in total a sum of Rs.1,79,50,000/- exclusive of other amounts paid by the applicant company forming part of the overall consideration of approximately Rs.3.80 crores.
2.1. Pursuant to the execution of the agreement and Addendum, the applicant company undertook extensive preparations for the live musical concert scheduled to be held on 15.07.2023 in Malaysia, as part of the proposed exclusive international concert series, and incurred substantial expenses. Thereafter during the course of the subsequent discussions and negotiations, the respondent acknowledged incons
The court ruled that contractual exclusivity claims are contingent upon the specific terms and duration of the agreement, emphasizing the necessity of demonstrating a prima facie case for interim rel....
The court held that a contract of personal service is not specifically enforceable, and restrictions on trade after termination violate Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act.
Copy right of video songs – Interim injunction - No prejudice is caused to the Appellant by the impugned order. The objection to the exploitation by Respondent No.2 regarding publicity is irrelevant ....
The termination of a contract is unjustified if the alleged breach does not constitute a material breach of its terms.
A contract is not concluded until there is consensus ad idem between the parties.
The court ruled that the subsequent agreement supersedes the initial agreement, establishing jurisdiction at Bhavnagar, and the applicants failed to meet the criteria for an interim injunction.
The Plaintiff is the rightful owner of copyright in the music album 'Kamasutra - Moods of Love', with the court ruling that oral agreements regarding copyright assignments are insufficient under the ....
The Plaintiff cannot issue licenses for sound recordings without being a registered Copyright Society as per Section 33 of the Copyright Act, 1957.
Section 9 of the 1996 Act cannot be used as a tool to compel the opposite party to pay money to the claimant.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.