SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Mad) 392

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.NIRMAL KUMAR
Lambodhara Textiles Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Akul Textiles – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : K.S. Karthik Raja
For the Respondent: P. Suganthi

JUDGMENT :

M. NIRMAL KUMAR, J.

1. The appellant as complainant filed a private complaint in C.C.No.130 of 2013 for offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (in short ‘N.I. Act’) against the respondents/accused. The trial Court, by judgment dated 13.10.2016, convicted the respondents and sentenced to undergo six months simple imprisonment and to pay the cheque amount of Rs.28,61,100/- jointly by respondents 1 to 3 as compensation. Aggrieved by the same, the respondents/accused preferred an appeal in Crl. A. No.137 of 2016 before the V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore. The learned Sessions Judge, by the judgment dated 13.12.2017, allowed the appeal setting aside the conviction and sentence passed by the trial Court, against which, the complainant had preferred the present appeal.

2. The case of the appellant/complainant is that the complainant is a limited Textile company authorised one Manoharan by Board Resolution dated 19.07.2010 to institute this complaint and prosecute the respondents. The first respondent is a partnership firm and respondents 2 and 3 are its partners. The first respondent placed orders with the appellant for purchase of p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top