SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Mad) 440

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.B.BALAJI
K.S.K. Nepolian Socraties – Appellant
Versus
S. Menaka – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : R. Marudhachalamurthy
For the Respondent: G. Mohanakrishnan

Table of Content
1. claim for interim maintenance. (Para 3 , 4 , 15)
2. court's reminder on legal standards for interim maintenance. (Para 5 , 11 , 17)
3. evidence of assets and financial circumstances. (Para 6 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 12 , 24)
4. legal reasoning for maintenance determination. (Para 18 , 19 , 21)
5. maintaining lifestyle during disputes. (Para 22 , 23 , 25)
6. final order on maintenance and return of articles. (Para 28 , 29)

ORDER :

2. I have heard Mr. R.Marudhachalamurthy, learned counsel for the petitioner/husband and Mr.G.Mohanakrishnan, learned counsel for the respondent/wife.

4. Mr.Marudhachalamurthy, learned counsel for the petitioner would invite my attention to the order passed by the Family Court on 23.10.2025. The respondent had filed IA.No.04 of 2021 seeking an interim maintenance of Rs.2,00,000/- per month and also Rs.3,00,000/- as maintenance. By order dated 29.04.2021, the Family Court ordered the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.1,25,000/- per month. The same was challenged before the Division Bench of this Court in CMA.No.1914 of 2021 and by order dated 29.03.2022, the Division Bench of this Court granted stay on condition that the petitioner complies with the order date

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top