SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 5260

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. ANAND VENKATESH, J.
 
Eros International Media Limited, Represented by its Authorised Representative Mr. Akshay Narayanrao Atkulwa – Appellant
Versus
14 Reels Entertainment Private Limited, Women’s Co-operative Housing Society – Respondent
OA No. 997 of 2025 AND OA No. 998 OF 2025 & ARB APPLN Nos. 1374 & 1388 of 2025
Decided On : 10-12-2025
 

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Akash Srinanda V for Ms.Vaibhav R Venkatesh
For the Respondent: Mr. Keerthikiran Murali, Mr. P. Giridharan, Mr. C. Prasanna Venkatesh

Court approved a settlement agreement between parties involved in a film distribution dispute, ensuring the transfer of rights and detailing obligations to be settled financially.

Headnote:(A) Interim Injunction - Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act - Applicant sought injunction against respondents concerning rights of a film pending settlement - Division Bench remitted matter back to Single Judge for adjudication on merits - An agreement for settlement was reached among parties detailing financial obligations and conditions regarding film rights - Order of interim injunction granted until fresh hearing. (Paras 1, 3, 5, 7, 10)

(B) Arbitration Agreement - Parties agreed on a financial settlement of Rs. 10 Crores, confirming transfer of film rights and obligations under previous agreements - Compliance terms stipulated, including penalties for default. (Paras 7, 11)

Facts of the case:
The case involved a dispute between two media entities concerning film distribution rights and related financial agreements, with interim relief sought by the appellant till the matter was resolved after an arbitral award.

Findings of Court:
The Settlement Agreement between parties was approved, including withdrawal of applications by the appellant upon receipt of part payment, leading to resolution of disputes.

Issues: The court examined maintainability of the interim injunction and the need to assess relative merits of claims by the parties.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the necessity of adjudicating the merits of the case to ensure equitable relief, while recognizing the enforceability of the settlement agreement reached between the parties.

Result: Applications disposed of in terms of the Settlement Agreement.

Table of Content
1. interim injunction sought regarding movie rights. (Para 1 , 2)
2. matter remitted back for adjudication of merits. (Para 3 , 4)
3. settlement agreement details outlined. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
4. parties agreed to withdraw claims under settlement. (Para 8 , 9)
5. order confirming settlement and interim injunction status. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
6. disposal of all applications with no costs. (Para 13)

ORDER :

N. ANAND VENKATESH, J.

1. The Original Applications were filed for order of interim injunction restraining the respondents 1 and 2 from creating any third party rights with respect to the Movie titled as "Akhanda II" till the entire payment covered under the Award is settled to the applicant.

2.The main Original Applications along with other Applications were dismissed by this Court by an order dated 30.10.2025.

3.Aggrieved by the same, the applicant filed OSA(CAD)Nos.118, 119, 135 and 136 of 2025. The Division Bench of this Court by an order dated 03.12.2025, allowed the appeals in the following terms:

33. Since the impugned order dismissing the Section 9 application is passed on the ground of maintainability and relative merits have not been adjudicated completely by the learned Single Judge, it would be appropriate for this Court to remit the matter back to the learned Single Judge for adjudication of relative merits and for passing appropriate orders.

34. Accordingly, the impugned order dated 30.10.2025 passed in O.A.Nos.997 & 998 of 2025 is set aside and the matter is remitted back to the learned Single Judge for adjudication of issues on merits and to pass appropriate orders. Till such time, the matter is taken up by the learned Single Judge for fresh hearing, interim injunction in CMP No.29782 of 2025 as such sought for in the said application is granted. After commencement of the hearing, it is for the learned Single Judge to consider granting of extension of interim relief or pass any other appropriate orders, as the case may be, on merits. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

4.Pursuant to the above order, these applications have been remitted back to enable this Court to hear the matter on merits and pass final orders. The Division Bench also made it clear that till the applications are taken up for fresh hearing, the interim injunction is granted and after the commencement of the hearing, the learned Single Judge can consider granting extension of interim relief or pass any appropriate orders.

5.After the matter was remitted back to this Court, the parties thought it fit to compromise the dispute among themselves. In order to facilitate the compromise between the applicant and respondents 1 and 2, the impleaded 3rd respondent got into the scene in order to provide the finance. Accordingly, the 3rd respondent filed application in A.Nos.1388 & 1374 of 2025 to implead themselves as the 3rd respondent in the main Original Applications and the impleading petition was also allowed by this Court.

6.When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the representatives of the applicant Company, the 2nd respondent Company and the 3rd respondent Company were present. The Settlement Agreement dated 08.12.2025, entered into between the parties and signed by the respective parties was placed before this Court.

7.The relevant terms of Agreement is extracted hereunder:

1. The SECOND PARTY confirms to transfer an amount of Rs. 10,00,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Crores Only) to the FIRST PARTY as a full and final settlement in relation to the disputes arising out of Film Distribution Agreement dated 20.12.2013, Assignment Agreement dated 17.10.2015 and Agreement-cum- Undertaking dated 17.10.2015 and Arbitral Award dated 23.07.2019 and in full release of the lien that has been marked over the films produced by the Second Party. The SECOND PARTY has offered to sell the rights of the movies as detailed in Annexure-1 of the SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, to the THIRD PARTY and the THIRD PARTY has agreed to purchase the same.

2 The THIRD

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top