Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
L.VICTORIA GOWRI
C. Muralitharan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By The Inspector Of Police – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. prosecution's allegations outline the case. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. petitioner's arguments against prosecution validity. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court's reasoning to dismiss quash petition. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 19) |
| 4. court dismisses petition, permits trial. (Para 20 , 21) |
ORDER:
L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.
This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, to call for the records pertaining to C.C.No.163 of 2025 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Madurai, arising out of Crime No.563 of 2010 registered for offences under Sections 420 and 506(ii) IPC, and to quash the same insofar as the petitioner/Accused No.12 is concerned, and for consequential reliefs.
Preface:
2. The inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C., 1973, is to be exercised sparingly, with circumspection, to prevent abuse of the process of any Court or otherwise to secure the ends of justice. At the stage of quash, this Court does not embark upon appreciation of evidence or adjudicate disputed questions of fact. If the allegations in the final report disclose a prima facie case and the matter requires trial, this Court would norma
The inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. allows quashing of proceedings only when no prima facie case is disclosed, with issues surrounding evidence and role requiring trial evaluation.
The court quashed proceedings for cheating and intimidation, finding no prima facie case due to lack of dishonest intention and insufficient evidence.
Inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. should be exercised sparingly to prevent abuse of process, and allegations must disclose a cognizable offence for proceedings to continue.
Point of Law : Offence of Cheating - Inherit Powers of High Court - Extraordinary and inherent power of this Court under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., do not tilt in favour of the petitioners to pass an or....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the sustainability of a prosecution can be affected by the long delay in filing a complaint, insufficiency of material evidence, and lack o....
Inherent powers to quash proceedings not exercisable to evaluate defences or conduct mini-trial; if allegations prima facie disclose cheating and breach of trust, case proceeds to trial despite accus....
The court established that civil disputes should not be mischaracterized as criminal offenses to avoid abuse of the judicial process.
Absence of 'entrustment' negates prosecution for Section 406 IPC, while sufficient allegations of deception necessitate continuation of Section 420 IPC charges.
The court established that civil disputes should not be cloaked as criminal offences, and quashing is warranted when no prima facie case exists.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that when disputes between the parties constitute only civil wrong and not a criminal wrong, the Courts would not permit a person to be harassed. T....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
