SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Mad) 541

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
K.MURALI SHANKAR
Indira – Appellant
Versus
Prema – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : J. Barathan, C. Christopher
For the Respondent: S. Srinivasa Raghavan

Table of Content
1. dispute over property ownership and construction rights (Para 1 , 2 , 4)
2. defendants argue lack of merit in plaintiff's suit (Para 5 , 8 , 13)
3. trial court dismissed plaintiff's suit (Para 6 , 7)
4. counsel's arguments focus on inaction and acquiescence (Para 9 , 10 , 12)
5. court emphasizes the significance of timely objection (Para 21 , 23)
6. mandatory injunction denied due to delay and acquiescence (Para 24 , 26)
7. compensation awarded instead of injunction (Para 27 , 28)

JUDGMENT :

1. The Second Appeal is directed against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.128 of 2017, dated 05.03.2018, on the file of the Subordinate Court, Tiruchendure, reversing the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.133 of 2011, dated 22.02.2013, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Tiruchendure.

3. For the sake of convenience and brevity, the parties will hereinafter be referred as per their status/ranking in their original suit.

(a) The suit I schedule property is owned by the plaintiff. The plaintiff settled the I schedule property in favour of her son Ramkumar, vide settlement deed dated 20.03.2002 and subsequently the said Ramkumar executed a settlement deed dated 18.09.2009 sett

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top