Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.SENTHILKUMAR
Reliance Industries Limited – Appellant
Versus
Studio Green Films Private Limited, represented by its authorised Signatory, Gnanavelraja K.E. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing applications for financial settlements (Para 1 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. details of production agreements shared (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. claims of breach of contract identified (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. responses to claims discussed (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 5. court finds case unconvincing (Para 30 , 35) |
| 6. dismissal of applications affirmed (Para 36) |
ORDER :
The present suit has been filed by the Plaintiff seeking recovery of a sum of Rs.22,00,00,000/- along with applicable GST amounting to Rs.3,98,00,000/- together aggregating to Rs.25,98,00,000/- along with interest at the rate of 14% from the date of disbursement till the date of realisation.
3.The application in A.No.5824 of 2025 has been filed to direct the respondents 3 to 6 to disclose on affidavit within 7 (seven) days:
(ii)amounts already paid and amounts presently due or to become due, head-wise (theatrical/overseas, digital/OTT, satellite, music and ancillary), with payment schedules and bank coordinate and
4.The application in A.No.5825 of 2025 has been filed to direct the respondents, their men, agents, distributors, assignees or any person claiming through them to pay and deposit to the credit of the suit forthwith and in any
Interim relief denied due to lack of prima facie case regarding applicant's rights over a film's revenues and established contractual breaches.
The court reinforced that repeated failures by a judgment debtor to comply with financial orders warrant strict enforcement of decrees, including prohibitions on releasing related assets.
The judgment emphasizes the principles of partnership obligations and interim reliefs in disputes regarding financial claims in film production agreements.
The main legal point established is the interpretation of the nature of the agreement and the determination of the limitation period for filing the suit.
Suppression of material facts in legal proceedings renders orders obtained non est in law, emphasizing the need for transparency in judicial processes.
The court ruled that the first defendant was not obligated to invest the full amount under the Film Investment Agreement, and both parties failed to meet their burden of proof.
Writ jurisdiction is not appropriate for resolving contractual disputes, especially when an arbitration clause exists in the agreement.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
