IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.SENTHILKUMAR, J.
Alphhatec Audio Video Private Limited - Applicant
Versus
Empower Tribe Commertial FZE, Fze (earlier Known As Music Tribe Fze) - Respondent
A. No. 2518 of 2025 AND C.S(COMM DIV) SR. No. 83176 Of 2025
Decided On : 05-01-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. establishment of business relationship between parties. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. claims of exclusivity in distributorship. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. contention of defendants regarding maintainability of the suit. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. standards for jurisdiction in civil suits. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. conditions under which leave to sue is evaluated. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 6. evaluation of cause of action and exclusive distributorship. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 7. dismissal of application for leave to sue. (Para 34 , 35) |
ORDER :
N.SENTHILKUMAR, J.
The plaintiff has filed the present suit as against the defendants for the following reliefs:
(a) That this Hon'ble Court be pleased to grant permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their men, agents, nominees or assigns or persons acting for and on their behalf and through and under them from engaging with, appointing or authorising with any third party in any manner whatsoever (whether by way of an express, implied, oral or written agreement or otherwise) for the import, promotion, resale and/or distribution of the defendants' product portfolio in India using any of the land, airway or seaway ports at Chennai;
(b) That this Hon'ble Court be pleased to grant permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their men, agents, nominees or assigns, or persons acting for and on their behalf and through and under them from entering into any kind of arrangement with any third party, including and not restricted to any express, implied, oral or written agreement or otherwise, for the import, promotion, resale and/or distribution of the defendants' product portfolio, that is currently in operation/to be executed in India;
(c) That this Hon'ble Court be pleased to pass any other order as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in light of the facts and circumstances of the present case and in the interest of justice and equity."
Along with the Plaint, an application was filed seeking the leave of this court to sue the defendants, who reside outside the territorial jurisdiction of this court.
2. The applicant/plaintiff claimed that they are carrying out business under the name and style of M/s.Alphatec Audio Video Private Limited, having its corporate office at A Wing - 709, Kanakia Wall Street, Andheri Kurla Road, Chakala, Mumbai 400 093 and having its local franchise at C/o.Studio Care, 'Singaram Saraswathi Illam', 14th Street, M.G.Chakrapani Nagar, Alapakkam, Chennai - 600 116.
3. The first defendant is Empower Tribe Commercial FZE, a company incorporated under the laws of UAE, having its registered office at FC0401WS90, Jebel Ali Free Zone, Dubai, United Arab Emirates and the second defendant is Music Tribe Commercial MY Sdn. Bhd., a company incorporated under the laws of Malaysia, having its registered office at 1-17-02, Suntech @ Penang, Cybercity, LinTang, Mayang Pasir 3, Bayan Baru, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia.
4. According to the plaintiff, the defendants are engaged in the business of sale and distribution of the audio video equipments across the globe under certain brands of the defendants such as - Behringer, Aston, Klarkteknik, Labgruppen, Lake, Midas, Tannoy, TC Electronic and TC Helcon, including the sale and distribution of such equipments under the said brand names in India. Prior to plaintiff's involvement in the sale and distribution of defendants' products in India, the second defendant had engaged another distributor for the sale of its products in Indian territory. However, since the year 2015, the plaintiff is in business relationship with the second defendant and that for over a decade, the plaintiff has served as the single window point of contact for the promotion, sale, and after sales service of the defendants' product portfolio in the Indian territory. The defendants' product portfolio which is promoted, sold and distributed by the plaintiff in the territory of India includes all the audio video equipments falling
A plaintiff must establish a valid cause of action within territorial jurisdiction; mere presence of a franchise and unsupported claims do not suffice for jurisdiction or exclusive rights.
The interpretation of the expression 'carries on business' in the context of the plaintiff under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and the Copyright Act, 1957, and the restrictions on the plaintiff's right t....
The cause of action for a commercial suit may not be based on invoices or purchase orders but on the underlying relationship between the parties, and the court may invoke provisions of CPC to delete ....
The necessity for substantiated factual averments in pleadings is essential to establish jurisdiction in cases involving copyright infringement under the Copyright Act.
Territorial jurisdiction in trademark infringement cases requires proof of actual sales in the jurisdiction, not mere trap transactions, supported by relevant documentation.
Jurisdiction in trade mark cases arises where cause of action occurs, including digital accessibility, not solely based on physical business locations.
Civil Law - Return of plaint - Territorial jurisdiction - It is not possible to reach at a conclusion that no cause of action has arisen within the territorial jurisdiction of this court on a mere re....
Jurisdiction for trademark infringement suits requires courts to accept plaint allegations as true; future apprehension of infringement can establish justiciability.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.