IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.VELMURUGAN, M.JOTHIRAMAN, JJ.
C. Krishnamoorthy – Appellant
Versus
State, Rep. by Inspector of Police, P-5, MKB Nagar Police Station, Chennai – Respondent
Crl. A. No.93 of 2024
Decided On : 05-01-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background and case details (Para 2) |
| 2. defense arguments questioning prosecution's evidence (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. prosecution's assertion of evidence sufficiency (Para 5) |
| 4. court's examination of evidence inconsistencies (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. critique of prosecution's reliability and witness accounts (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 6. court's decision on reasonable doubt and acquittal (Para 22) |
| 7. final outcome of the appellate decision (Para 23) |
JUDGMENT :
M. Jothiraman, J.
This criminal appeal has been filed by the appellants / accused 1 and 2 challenging the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 19.10.2023 made in S.C.No.386 of 2018 passed by the learned XVI Additional Sessions Judge, Chennai, in and by which both the appellants were convicted under Section 302 r/w.34 IPC and sentenced to undergo Life Imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/- in default to undergo 1 year simple imprisonment.
2. Brief case of the prosecution is as follows:
2.1. On 03.09.2017 at about 6’O clock evening near PV colony, PW1 / Defacto complainant – Tmt.Uma Maheswari went to the deceased house and seen him. On the same day PW1 went to her sister’s house / PW2’s house. At that time. She received an information about her brother – Tr.Kalaivanan / deceased assaulted A1 by pelting stones. PW1 went to the deceased’s house and gave advise to him. PW1 again went to PW2’s house. Subsequently, on the same day, she received an information about the quarrel between the deceased with the accused near the residence of the deceased and when they reached, A1 and A2 assaulted the deceased by using bamboo sticks – M.Os.1 & 2, Cement Concrete- M.O.3, threatened the public by throwing stones and thereafter, fled away from the scene of occurrence. Public informed “108” ambulance and sent the deceased to Stanley Government Hospital for treatment. In the meanwhile, PW1 proceeded to the police station and lodged a complaint Ex.P1 before PW14.
2.2. PW2 – Tmt.Kamatchi is the sister of PW1 and she deposed similar to the evidence of PW1. PW3- Tr.Kannan deposed that on 03.09.2017 at night 11.30 p.m., he heard the shouting of women while he was in his house. He saw the deceased was lying on the floor with injuries on his head and nearby to the injured, he saw bamboo stick and stone. He informed “108” ambulance and the injured was taken to the hospital.
2.3. PW4 – Tr.Hajari Ram deposed that he is running a shop and on03.09.2017, he saw that there was blood stains found near to his shop. PW5 – Tr.Karan deposed that on 04.09.2017, while he was walking along with elder brother Tr.Arun- PW6 near Mullai Nagar burial ground, police arrested two persons and requested them to be witnesses. The arrested persons gave confession statements and the same has been recorded by police. PW5 signed in the confession statements given by them. PW5’s signature found in the confession statement is Ex.P2 and his signature found in the Mahazar is Ex.P3. Similarly PW6 deposed the save version stated by PW5 and his signature found in the confession statement is Ex.P4 and the signature found in the Mahazar is Ex.P5.
2.4. PW9- Tr.Jayaraman, Grade I Police Constable deposed that on 05.09.2017, the Inspector of Police has given requisition to conduct autopsy on the body of the deceased. He handed over the requisition to the autopsy doctor in the Stanley Government Hospital and after conducting autopsy, he handed over the body to the relatives of the deceased.
2.5. PW11 – Tr.Madhan deposed that on 06.09.2017 at 7.00 a.m., when he was travelling along with his friend Sekar, he saw that police had enquired A2 – Raj and requested them to be witnesses for the arrest of A2. A2 has given confession statement. In the confession statement of A2, they have signed as witnesses. Based on the confession statement, A2 took them to his house at Annai Sathya Nagar and also identified Blue Colour Pant and Blood Stained Full Sleeve Shirt under Mahazar and handed over the sa
The prosecution must establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt; inconsistencies and procedural failures in witness accounts can lead to acquittal.
Conviction in criminal cases requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt; contradictions and lack of credible evidence can lead to reversal of such convictions.
The prosecution must prove its case beyond reasonable doubt; mere suspicion is insufficient to convict, especially where witness credibility is in question.
The burden of proof lies with the prosecution, which must provide credible and consistent evidence to sustain a conviction; acquittal upheld due to reasonable doubt.
Eyewitness testimony, particularly from injured witnesses, is crucial in establishing guilt, even with minor inconsistencies in their accounts.
The prosecution must prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt. If there is any doubt as to the guilt of the accused, the accused must be acquitted.
A conviction for murder can be sustained based on the credible testimony of a single eyewitness, corroborated by medical evidence and circumstantial facts establishing motive.
The court affirmed the conviction of the accused for murder, finding sufficient evidence of an unlawful assembly and individual culpability amid claims of inconsistencies in prosecution testimony.
The conviction for murder was upheld based on substantial eyewitness testimony and evidence of motive, affirming the principle that direct evidence substantiates a guilty verdict beyond reasonable do....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of reliable and convincing evidence in proving the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.