JUDGMENT :

K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J.

1. This Appeal, under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, has been filed by the appellants/claimants in MCOP No.698 of 2021, on the file of the Special District Court, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Krishnagiri, for enhancement of the sum awarded by the claims tribunal.

2. Shortly stated, on 05.02.2020, at about 13.00 hours, the deceased Narayana Achari was riding his two wheeler bearing Registration No.TN-70- C-1038, from Rayakottai towards Hosur. At that time, near Alaseebam Government High Secondary School Bridge, a Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation bus bearing Registration No.TN-29-N-2869, driven by its driver in a rash and negligent manner, came from behind and hit the two wheeler of the deceased, as a result of which, the deceased sustained fatal injuries, and was taken to Government Hospital, Hosur, for first aid. Thereafter, he was shifted to Government Hospital, Salem, for further treatment. In spite of intensive treatment, he died on 14.02.2020. FIR was registered against the driver of the bus.

3. The legal representatives of the deceased preferred a claim petition for a compensation of Rs.30,00,000/- for the loss caused to them due to the death of deceased Narayana Achari. The respondent/Transport Corporation resisted the claim petition. The learned Tribunal, after analysing the oral and documentary evidence, held that the accident occurred due to rash and negligent driving of the driver of the offending bus, awarded a total sum of Rs.7,76,000/- and directed the respondent/Transport Corporation to pay the award amount to the claimants. Aggrieved over the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal, the appellants/claimants are on appeal.

4. Mr.S.P. Yuaraj, the learned counsel for the appellants/claimants submits that, the deceased was an agriculturist at the time of accident earning a sum of Rs.30,000/- per month, however, the Tribunal had fixed the notional income of the deceased at Rs.9,000/- per month, which is very meagre. He would further submit that the Tribunal failed to award more amount for love and affection and for transport expenses. Hence, prayed for enhancement of compensation awarded by the Tribunal.

5. On the other hand, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent / Transport Corporation would submit that the learned Tribunal, upon considering the facts and circumstances of the case, has awarded just compensation, which warrants any interference by this Court.

6. Heard on both sides. Records perused.

7. The findings of the learned Tribunal regarding the involvement of the bus in question and the deceased having sustained fatal injuries which ultimately resulted in his death, are not disputed. The aforesaid findings of the learned Tribunal appear to be quite correct. The findings are based on proper appreciation of evidence on record and there is no ground to interfere with the above findings of the learned Tribunal. Hence, the findings of the learned Tribunal in this regard are affirmed.

8. Now, the question arises as to whether fixing of notional monthly income of the deceased at Rs.9,000/- and the compensation awarded under the other heads by the Tribunal are appropriate and reasonable.

9. On a perusal of the impugned order, it is seen that since no proof has been adduced by the claimants for the income of the deceased, the Tribunal had fixed the notional monthly income of the deceased at Rs.9,000/-. However, considering the year of accident and the avocation of the deceased, this Court deems it fit to fix the monthly income of the deceased at Rs.15,000/-. Since there are 4 dependants, 1/4 is deducted towards the personal expenses of the deceased. Considering the age of the deceased and applying the principles laid down in National Insurance Co. vs Pranay Sethi and others reported in 2017 (2) TNMAC 601, no future prospects is applicable and multiplier 7 is adopted as per the judgment reported in 2009 (2) TN MAC 1 (SC), Sarala Varma and Others vs. Delhi