IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P. Velmurugan, K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi, JJ.
M/s.V.V.V and Sons Edible Oils Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
M/s.Meenakshi Overseas LLC – Respondent
O.S.A.No.63 of 2019, O.S.ANo.64 of 2019 & OSA(CAD) No.23 of 2022 & O.S.A.No.139 of 2025, O.S.A.No.140 of 2025 & C.M.P.Nos. 6021 of 2019 & 2952 of 2022
Decided On : 05-06-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. consolidation of related trademark infringement suits and procedural history. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 2. parties' contentions regarding infringement, foreign trademark registration, and suit maintainability. (Para 10) |
JUDGMENT :
P.Velmurugan J.
1.Since the parties, issues involved, and questions of law arising in all these appeals are substantially interconnected, all the appeals are taken up together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.
2. These appeals have been filed by the appellant/plaintiff M/s.V.V.V &Sons Edible Oils Limited challenging the judgments and decrees passed in the connected suits, as well as the applications filed by the defendants whereby the plaints were rejected. The prayers in all these appeals are as follows:
"2.1. O.S.A.No.63 of 2019 – filed challenging the dismissal of C.S.No.726 of 2017, wherein the plaint seeking permanent injunction was rejected.
2.2. O.S.A. No.64 of 2019 – filed challenging the fair and decretal order passed in A.No.1948 of 2018, which resulted in the rejection of the plaint in C.S.No. 726 of 2017 by allowing A.No.1948 of 2018 under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.
2.3. O.S.A.No.23 of 2022 – filed challenging the judgment in C.S.No.434 of 2017, wherein the suit for injunction, accounts of profit, and damages was dismissed, and costs of Rs.1,00,000/- were imposed on the plaintiff.
2.4. O.S.A.No.139 of 2025 – filed challenging the order in C.S.No.987 of 2017, whereby the plaint seeking injunction and damages of Rs.10,00,000/- was rejected by allowing A.No.1705 of 2022.
2.5. O.S.A.No.140 of 2025 – filed challenging the judgment in C.S.No.235 of 2020, whereby the plaint seeking injunction and damages of Rs.10,00,000/- was rejected by allowing A.No.1706 of 2022."
3. The respondents herein are the defendants or applicants in the respective suits, and according to the plaintiff, their alleged roles are as follows:-
"3.1. In C.S.No.726 of 2017 (O.S.A.No.63 of 2019), the defendants are three in number:
M/s.Meenakshi Overseas LLC of USA, a foreign company that obtained registration of the mark Idhayam abroad and sells sesame oil in that market; M/s.Shivaraja Impex Company of Virudhunagar, the supplier and exporter of sesame oil from India to the USA; and M/s.Damodar Foods of Coimbatore, engaged in packing and exporting snacks and edible products to the USA.
3.2. In Application No.1948 of 2018 in C.S.No.726 of 2017 (O.S.A.No.64 of 2019), the sole respondent is M/s.Meenakshi Overseas LLC of USA, the foreign trademark holder and seller of sesame oil in the USA.
3.3. In C.S.No.434 of 2017 (O.S.A.(CAD)No.23 of 2022), the defendant is M/s.Damodar Foods of Coimbatore, an exporter of snacks to the USA.
3.4. In C.S.No.987 of 2017 (O.S.A.No.139 of 2025), the first defendant-M/s.Damodar Foods, is engaged in manufacturing, preparing, and exporting products by imitating the plaintiff’s product name and brand name Idhayam to the second defendant, M/s.RR Global Enterprises of USA.
3.5. In C.S.No.235 of 2020 (O.S.A.No.140 of 2025), the defendant is again M/s.Damodar Foods of Coimbatore, exporter of snacks to the USA."
4. In short, the appellant in all these appeals is the plaintiff, M/s.V.V.V & Sons Edible Oils Ltd, the manufacturer of sesame oil under the brand name "Idhayam". The respondents herein are the defendants/applicants in the respective suits, and for the sake of convenience they will hereinafter be referred to as:
4.1. M/s.Meenakshi Overseas LLC of USA “foreign trader”;
4.2. M/s.Shivaraja Impex Company of Virudhunagar “exporter”; and
4.3. M/s.Damodar Foods of Coimbatore “manufacturer/packer”;
4.4. M/s.R.R.Global Enterprises "importer/distributor"
5. Facts in C.S.No.726 of 2017 & A.No.1948 of 2018 (O.S.A.Nos.63 and 64 of 2019)
5.1. The appellant/plaintiff M/s.V.V.V & Sons Edible Oils Limited, a public limited company incorporated in India, is engaged in the manufacture and sale of sesame oil under the registered trade mark Idhayam. The plaintiff claims that the mark Idhayam has b
NAWAL KISHORE SHARMA VS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
MYTRAH ENERGY (INDIA) LIMITED VS GAMESA RENEWABLE PRIVATE LIMITED & OTHERS.
AHMED ABDULLA AHMED AL GHURAIRVS STAR HEALTH & ALLIED INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED AND ORS.
The use of the mark 'SUPER POSTMAN' by defendants was found to infringe the plaintiff's rights in the 'POSTMAN' mark due to deceptive similarity and ongoing goodwill of the plaintiff's trademark desp....
Each act of trademark infringement constitutes a fresh cause of action, allowing the aggrieved party to file a new suit for ongoing violations.
The court established that the rights of the prior user of a trademark are superior to those of a subsequent user, emphasizing the elements of goodwill, misrepresentation, and damage in passing off c....
Point of Law : Section 27 of Trade Marks Act provides that no action for infringement will lie in respect of an unregistered trade mark.
The court upheld the plaintiff's rights as the prior user and registered owner of the trademark, granting an injunction against the defendant's use of a similar mark due to the likelihood of consumer....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.