S.C.PARIJA
Prasanna Kumar Das – Appellant
Versus
Republic of India – Respondent
ORDER :- The petitioner, who is a practising advocate of Bhubaneswar Bar has filed this revision application under Section 401, Cr.P.C. challenging the order dated 13-10-2006 passed by the learned Special C.J.M. (CBI), Bhubaneswar, rejecting the petition filed under Sections 227 and 228, Cr.P.C. and directing framing of charge against the petitioner under Section 120-B read with Section 420, I.P.C.
2. The case of the prosecution, is that, accused No. 1-Manoj Kumar Ray set up a business to deal in Two-wheelers in the month of January, 1997 under the name and style M/s. Usha Auto mobiles. He opened a current account in Bank of India, SSI Branch, Bhubaneswar on 17-2-98. A couple of months thereafter he applied to the Bank for a Cash Credit Limit up to Rs. 8 lacs. The Bank while enquiring into his solvency and eligibility relied on the Valuation Report submitted by accused No. 3-Tara Prasad Dhal, an Architect and Proprietor of M/s. Design Group, Saheed Nagar, Bhubaneswar in respect of the landed property offered by the loanee as collateral security belonging to one of the guarantors i.e., Rahas Bihari Beura. A limit up to Rs. 8 lacs was sanctioned on 18-4-98 and the amount was released
2. AIR 2005 SC 359 : 2004 AIR SCW 6813 (Rel. on.)
3. 2004 Cri LJ 598 : AIR 2004 SC 517 : 2003 AIR SCW 6501 (Rel. on)
7. 2002 Cri LJ 998 : AIR 2002 SC 671 : 2002 AIR SCW 286
8. 2000 Cri LJ 944 : AIR 2000 SC 665 : 2000 AIR SCW 189 (Rel. on)
10. 1992 Cri LJ 527 : AIR 1992 SC 604 (Rel. on)
9. 1993 Cri LJ 600 : AIR 1993 SC 892 : 1993 AIR SCW 248 (Rel. on)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.